(1) regarding your "Tell you one more thing. Few years back, someone used few hundred dollar to buy a win from his opponent to get 乙级. His opponent later told the whole world about it. Yes the whole world. Most forumers here heard it. This is real fixing. This person in the end could not perform in many competitions after promoted. But this player try to play 岳不群。 So whats your own 'CONCLUSION' on this person? "

you just try to stir up another issue, I have make it very clear, if this is the case, I look down on both including both not so young and young players which I heard from others. If the young player has the courage to tell other people, he should have the courage to tell SIXGA and have both disqualified and join the competition the next time. Could it be he played badlly for the game and he just try to give reason(s) to his young friends .....

(2) regarding your "I tell you the truth on the 'fix' posting ba. Just to stop your rubbish and mindless 'CONCLUSION'. I have heard from one the personal involved. But I have no intention to do anything further. I'm not involve in this national(just a spectator) and I have already verbally informed the organiser. Thats the end of my job.". Can I trust you ???

Since you are not a player in 2008 National Open, and you have also let us see your quality of your postings in the past 3 to 4 weeks, I reserve my conclusion.

you just try to stir up another issue, I have make it very clear, if this is the case, I look down on both including both not so young and young players which I heard from others. If the young player has the courage to tell other people, he should have the courage to tell SIXGA and have both disqualified and join the competition the next time. Could it be he played badlly for the game and he just try to give reason(s) to his young friends .....

GOOD CONCLUSION! Already told you many people look down...Well the younger player got speak the truth? Maybe the performance of the buyer in the past and future will strengthen our believe. Do you agree?




Can I trust you ???

People are laughing at that. Your trust don't worth money. I have told what I need to tell and wanted to end it weeks ago. But one politician just keep bringing the issue up.



Since you are not a player in 2008 National Open, and you have also let us see your quality of your postings in the past 3 to 4 weeks, I reserve my conclusion.

Same to you. Mr Politician.

hihihi ....

Have you realised nobody get as worked up in the 'fix' issue as you?

Aside the issue, I suddenly want to recite a saying but can't remember all words
'X地无银XX两, 隔壁阿牛不X偷'

We heard about the case before 2005 ... but could not remember which year.

in normal years, only 4 players can be promoted to 乙级, those promoted should have their standards.

For 2005 & 2006, more promoted due to a combined system, in fact, I ranked 6th in 2005 out of 8 if we count only those players without grades, i.e. in normal year, I would not have my promotion, but due to the change of "exam system" in 2005, I got my Grade B.

Those promoted in 2006 under the same exam system as in 2005. More than 4 non-graded promoted too.

This could be one of the reasons that the Groups A & B systems are used again in 2007 ....

My xiangqi skill could be poor but this is not my problem.

How to settle it ? The easy way is to downgrade the bottom 10 or 20 % or the players which did not play for a number of years.

So, bls should talk to 象总会长 or 棋一生 since you know them for so many years.

I sent out :

A True Situation ....... － 2008八连负　905 bytes 2008-07-04 13:22 (8 reads)

before reading the below :

有没有做过，大家心知肚明吧。可以X耳X铃的吗？ － bls　181 bytes

I find that bls gives a lot of assumptions when he is not able to show evident.

All 网友 should know from my past postings since 13 May 2007 that I normally pay attentions to systems instead of individuals but sometimes got heated up by those lousy posts.

As mentioned in this website, SIXGA is my 2nd lover, and only lately I talked about 4th lover.

Previously in this website, we talked about the Singapore Grading System and I also brought it up to 象总会长 on the matter. For actual implementation, a lot of issues need to be looked into, the qualification director of SIXGA New EXCO is tasked to look into it as his main duties.

This is just to mention one of the examples that all of us as xiangqi lovers try to improve the situations for Singapore Xiangqi Development.

I will not value bls's way of talking in this website and from now on I will just ignore his postings regardless of quality as I do not want to waste time on this matter further.

I hope I can continue until say when SIXGA Forum Website is up.

Thank you.

I can still continue to talk what I want to talk. But make sure you mean it when you say you will ignore my posting. Including this one. Still I repeat. 有没有做过，大家心知肚明吧。可以X耳X铃的吗？wow shiok. Now I can say what I want without 2008八连负 disturbing.... Make sure make sure you ignore all my postings.... Including this one. Make sure make sure make sure....

相信通过几个回合的讨论，广大网友已经完全理解了两位前辈的立场。

strategy draw started in the earlier round but I still try to figure out how he could do it so early ??? No wonder I saw him keep on doing calculations for the last few rounds. :D

He confirmed about the discussion after Round 5 and he also did not blame me for not able to get any 对手分 for him.

Regarding strategy draw, it happened before even in more important event, if I could recall should be at 2003

第十一届亚洲象棋名手邀请赛

2003年12月12日至17日，新加坡

What I wanted to highlight is whoever is playing strategy draw, make sure you really can move into Top 4.

With this, I hope I have closed the item added in the KIV list.

I will take note about

上网表达己见应谨慎负责 ..... 所散布的信息将永存于互联网.....

and even more careful in future postings.

hope to have more happy posting environment in 悟入棋途. :)

thanks