anyway, personally I do not like to get into it since 6 years ago when I was elected to SIXGA EXCO.

As mentioned, I respect whoever is taking charge of SIXGA and help out if time permits and the right way to change it if not happy should be through election and not other means.

As for RC matter, the matter was referred up and I do not want to touch on it further.

initially I plan to ignore all post(s) related to this matter.

Anyway, if I am asked to give my views for considerations, I will provide as below :

争夺资源的隐忧 -- this is not a concern, the concern is more on RC's objective, PA HQ should have very clear stand on this matter. As for the training of young xiangqi players at National Level, definitely it is the direction of SIXGA and not any of the 550 RCs should look into it.

蓄意对抗 is more on the RC team, as mentioned early, if this group of xiangqi players could find one C.C. and help the C.C. to build a xiangqi team, I believe quite a number of C.C.s will like to have it.

I believe 碧山象棋会以及新加坡象棋总会 both know about their own directions but seem to me that the RC team do not know about the RC objective.

As for 悟入棋途论坛, I have my reservation now regarding its stand of 中立, e.g. I am one of the 网友 here but I have the strong objection to participate, how about other 网友 ?

As 中立论坛, is it better for 悟入棋途版主 to consult Singapore National Xiangqi Body, i.e. SIXGA on this matter.

Anyway, I will stop here and just wait for the directive from PA HQ and do not wish to discuss on this matter further.

although you are sending this post in your personal capacity but a lot of players may think this is also the official stand from the 3rd man.

By the way, for 美容, when 政府 take action on the shop could be after the events, ended up with ugly faces or the worst cause a life, so, not a good example too.

do you know in the commercial buildings, some have the water supplier for drinking or industrial use.

One building in the north connected the water pipes wrongly after maintenance several years ago, ended up .....

The commercial building example as given by 业余棋评家, do you know how the building connect the water pipes, could it be only drinking water for level 3 only ? Even toilets could have both types of connections !!!

my suggestion to you is try to be more careful in your talks instead of apologies later so many times.

Your last sentence is to ask me not to join the competition ?! you can 专心 打谱 and I can continue with the 八连负, are you suggesting those not able to reach the top 8 not to join the competition ? Are we wanting more graded players to come out ?

Actually, we can learn from Hong Kong to demote a player, say in the last 20 % or not coming out for a number of years, we have such discussions in 悟入棋途 previously too.

winning me or they are thinking for me to get more 对手分 for them ?

having same stand when facing the public .....

SIXGA EXCO may need to learn this too.

anyway, not easy to get permit (to Boon Lay or Bishan) for future years when I stay at Tanjong Pagar.

"this matter was referred up yesterday, ........" is regarding RC matter to PA HQ.

I believe we like to have those strong ones in top 8 and do not need to wait for me on 对手分.

Only those Top 8 will be promoted to 甲级 and only 甲级 can be considered to 代表国家出赛.

I believe that at least a few of the players for 2008 Group A are quite sure before the competition starts that not able to join this year Top 8, is it better for us not to join the competition at all ? After so much effort, SIXGA and Boon Lay managed to get 22 players for this year Group A, I joined this year purely to give my support to Boon Lay although distance is one of my main concerns, of course, I had chances in some of the games too but definitely still in the bottom few of the ranking.

On 棋一生's request to ask for the name of “众棋友” for him [有机会阐明“会与个人”的关系。], when I gave the “众棋友” as SIXGA EXCO, instead of for him to 阐明“会与个人”的关系 in his next EXCO meeting, he said : [那我就等待SIXGA EXCO对我采取行动吧！！！] what is the whole logic of these !!!

众棋友 may notice from the past incidences that both 棋一生 and I talked at different "languages", I still could recall that

棋一生 said -- "我希望以后你看到我写的文章，是真的也好，虚构的也好，就当作看故事小说就好，不要过于认真。"

could this be the main reason ? He is writing 小说 but I treat them as facts. :(

By the way, who is 网络蚂蚁 ?

please close this matter since you agree to him. Thanks.

for those playing with me, they cannot expect me to lost to them and then playing even harder later to get 对手分 for them.

I play hard for each and every game, for me to get higher points will include winning of them too, you cannot expect best of both worlds.

Anyway, I will not give away points for any competition.

personally I think (may be wrong) when you read

Rubbish again ! － 网络蚂蚁　491 字节 2008-06-30 14:38 (51 点击)

you thought he directed the post to me, so you said

网络蚂蚁真有正义感，佩服，佩服！！！ － 棋一生　0 字节 2008-06-30 16:10 (27 点击)

So when you understood that in fact the "Rubbish again" was directed to you .... then ....

please note the word "again" !!!, which of your past postings with the "Rubbish" remark from 网络蚂蚁 ?!

As the 3rd man in SIXGA, you are part of the team to promote Xiangqi Development in Singapore and more important is to provide direction for Xiangqi Development in Singapore.

Your discouragement remarks for low skill players including me even in personal capacity is no good to your image as 3rd man and also to SIXGA too. Please be more careful in your postings.

I use "2008八连负" as my name in 悟入棋途 is not only to remind myself of my poor performance in 2008 National Open Group A but at the same time I want to encourage other players to come out to join the competitions. Whether I put in more effort later to improve my skill should not stop me to join future competitions if time permits. Yes, 对手分 may affect other players in their rankings, but we are getting the best to represent our Nation, they should not be selected just due to having higher 对手分 from me. They should count on their own strengths.

better not for him to go into Top 4. :D


I only played with two players in Top 8. You can check with both regarding my games with them.