求教:关于claim third party车险
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 本帖共有 43 楼,当前显示第 10 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:x4 (等级:7 - 出类拔萃,发帖:7280) 发表:2015-06-23 00:37:41  10楼 
不对,路上也没法claim。http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/cars-cars-204/confirm-if-drivers-caught-drunk-driving-other-drivers-cant-claim-against-him-5058114.html
这里讲得比较全面且权威
http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;query=DocId%3A9734be6d-4ff3-40be-82f3-410c200bcea3%20%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0

法律相关解读参考这段
In Singapore, the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act (Cap 189, 2000 Rev Ed) makes it compulsory for motorists to insure against liability for causing death or personal injury to other road users. The injured victim is not a party to the insurance contract. But under the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act, he is granted an enforceable right to claim damages from the insurer if he first obtains judgment against the motorist. The issue arises as to whether the injured victim of a road accident is able to claim if the motorist had committed a traffic offence (such as drunken driving or causing death by a rash or negligent act). The objective of compulsory motor insurance is the protection of victims of road accidents and public policy tends to operate in favour of the injured victim because compensation of the injured victim is stronger policy consideration than deterrence. Hence, it is arguable that the injured victim’s claim is not affected by the motorist’s commission of traffic offences.

出处:http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/commercial-law/chapter-24
搜索motor insurance
可提供任何关于保险方面的咨询解答
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 43 楼,当前显示第 10 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码