2009 tried to have 女子组 twice but both failed.


Even for 公开B组, from what I read here previously, SIXGA plans to try out three years in 2009, 2010 and 2011 to have twice a year and to review later.

as mentioned previously, it is an on-going process to look for better and workable system by SIXGA officials.

9 + 0 system was used in 2006 and resulted in too many drawn cases within unexpected short time.

7 + 2 system was used in 2007, 2008 and 2009.

9 + 1 system is indicated in 2010 rules.

We should leave the review by SIXGA officials after the end of 2010 competitions and do not suggest any changes to the rules as 26 players have registered with the existing rules.

Furthermore, SIXGA officials have not provided details of the +1 system and only the Top 8 after 9 rounds will be affected, all 26 players should try your best to get into Top 8 first and any discussion may not have any meaning at this point.

A组第十轮慢棋如果排名靠前者拿先手，下和的话，

just keep to the original ranking could be one of the options too.

as 棋手, we can talk a lot on the systems ..... the rules are there for 2010 Singapore Open, no one is forced to join, as 棋手, we should just hope that the systems are better and better over the years. It is very unfair to 赛务 if any 棋手 plans to force a change in rules at this eleventh hour. The main duties of 棋手 is just to concentrate on the games now and let 赛务 to worry about the systems.


as 赛务, they have to tackle the issues ....... for those problems appear in 2010 Singapore Open if any, they have to review them and plan to have better systems in future.


The recent concluded Vietnam event with 9 + 2 and 9 + 1 systems for the Top 4 and next 4, I believe they have their reasons for using the systems too.

x + 1 systems are used in China too.

The generation of such discussions just one day before the competition is very very unfair to the organisers especially when the rules are released for many many days by now.

e.g.

the recent Vietnam event has used

慢棋分先两局 + 如和加赛快棋

for Positions 5 to 8

with

5 vs 8 and

6 vs 7.


If possible, the details of Round 10 should be released asap.

a previous report on 2006全国赛赛后分析。。。。。。

----------------------------------------------------------

。。。。。。


由于今年全国赛的一些资料在网上公布，这里我们可以尝试进行一些赛后分析。

2005 年的前20 名中只有12 名参加了今年的全国赛， 再加上已报名的两名甲级棋手的缺席， 否则今年全国赛的战况将会更加激烈。在7月30日晚上的最后一轮比赛， 战况没有想像中激烈， 好几台的比赛很快的以和局收场。有一位观众表示，为了使最后几轮比赛的棋手有更好的表现， 可能应该有如世界杯足球赛的赛制， 最后16强或32强进行淘汰赛。目前的赛制使到棋手只希望保持不败， 以求和的心理完成最后一轮赛事， 希望靠他人的成绩来促成自己的进圈。

。。。。。。

I believe SIXGA will conduct a review after Singapore Open 2010.

7 + 3, it is a 10-round system

7 + 2, it is a 9-round system

9 + 1, it is a 10-round system

9 + 0, it is a 9-round system

11 + 0 it is a 11-round system.

e.g. 卷心菜 joined 2009 Season 2 Group B (7 + 3) system bot not free to join +3 system at a later stage. Could we say the system is unfair to 卷心菜 as he got Position No. 2 after 7 rounds.

For 7 + 2 system, the Position No. 1 after 7 rounds can drop to Position No. 4 after +2 rounds, For 9 + 1 system, the Position No. 1 after 9 rounds can drop to Position No. 2 after +1 round, for player in Position No. 1, 9 +1 system is definitely better than 7 + 2 system. If we use Vietnam 9 + 1 system for Top 8, the Position No. 1 after 9 rounds can drop to Position No. 5 after +1 round, and for our 7 + 3 system, the Position No. 1 after 7 rounds can drop to Position No. 8 after +3 rounds, this is one of the reasons, I prefer Vietnam 9 + 1 system for Top 8 than our 7 + 3 system for Top 8.

A few writers here still do not understand what is the actual meaning of a competition system, for (9+1) system, you need to complete total of 10 rounds to qualify for the final ranking of Top 8 in 2010 Group A.

Same way of consideration, for 2010 Group B (7 + 3) system, you need to complete total of 10 rounds to qualify for the final ranking of Top 8 in 2010 Group B.

For 2010 Singapore Open regardless Group A and Group B, both are 10-round system, no one can claim he is the No. 1 after 70-meter or 90-meter in a 100-meter running event.