【婚姻家庭】遇到这样的情况,你会怎么办
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 60 楼,当前显示第 51 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:赶超美日 (等级:5 - 略有小成,发帖:2267) 发表:2015-11-19 11:07:14  51楼 
一句话总结:婚姻的长度。一般而言,短期各拿各的,超长期平分,越长越趋向平分。

Loh Swee Peng v Chan Kui Kok [2015] SGHC 64

The factor which weighs most strongly with me is that this is, by any measure, a very long marriage. At the date of the hearing, the marriage had endured for 42 years. The longevity of the emotional, parental, social and economic bond between the spouses is to my mind a very weighty factor that overshadows all others. In particular, it causes the importance of the precise ratio of the parties’ direct contributions which were made decades earlier and which I am now attempting assess decades later on imperfect and incomplete evidence to recede into the background. The length of the marriage is a factor which points towards the just and equitable division of the matrimonial assets being an equal division.

Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo [2015] SGHC 56

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye[2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one.

Wong Sook Kuen v Loh Choon Fah [2015] SGHC 36

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye [2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one. Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

AOB v AOC [2015] SGHC 13

The parties have been married for more than 20 years. Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye [2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one. Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng [2013] SGHC 275

96 I observed that in most of the cases identified in the sample above, where the wife received 35% of the matrimonial assets, the marriage was generally less than 20 years. On the other hand, for marriages more than 20 years, the wife was awarded 40%.

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 60 楼,当前显示第 51 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码