一句话总结:婚姻的长度。一般而言,短期各拿各的,超长期平分,越长越趋向平分。
所在版块:心情闲聊 发贴时间:2015-11-19 11:07

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 

Loh Swee Peng v Chan Kui Kok [2015] SGHC 64

The factor which weighs most strongly with me is that this is, by any measure, a very long marriage. At the date of the hearing, the marriage had endured for 42 years. The longevity of the emotional, parental, social and economic bond between the spouses is to my mind a very weighty factor that overshadows all others. In particular, it causes the importance of the precise ratio of the parties’ direct contributions which were made decades earlier and which I am now attempting assess decades later on imperfect and incomplete evidence to recede into the background. The length of the marriage is a factor which points towards the just and equitable division of the matrimonial assets being an equal division.

Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo [2015] SGHC 56

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye[2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one.

Wong Sook Kuen v Loh Choon Fah [2015] SGHC 36

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye [2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but  for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one. Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

AOB v AOC [2015] SGHC 13

The parties have been married for more than 20 years. Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye [2007] 3 SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division . That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one . Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng [2013] SGHC 275

96 I observed that in most of the cases identified in the sample above, where the wife received 35% of the matrimonial assets, the marriage was generally less than 20 years. On the other hand, for marriages more than 20 years, the wife was awarded 40%.

.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
【婚姻家庭】遇到这样的情况,你会怎么办 有问题   (524 bytes , 6103reads )
如果换成是男的什么都拿,什么都不出,你觉得如何? rim   (352 bytes , 86reads )
哈哈哈 林子99   (478 bytes , 55reads )
我们家也是全由我负责的 滚雪球   (457 bytes , 61reads )
哈哈哈哈哈哈 hdeksa   (141 bytes , 52reads )
这个我们比你好 滚雪球   (197 bytes , 54reads )
还能给男方买一件衣服,算是很体贴了。 materialist   (0 bytes , 42reads )
你是想要人还是要钱呢 哎呀我倒   (212 bytes , 53reads )
离婚吧,趁还早。 17eye   (0 bytes , 53reads )
楼主不妨把工作辞了在家闲坐几个月, 看看反应 abcxyz2   (85 bytes , 51reads )
赶紧离婚 very3b   (44 bytes , 69reads )
lz一边在这儿问老婆要离婚该怎么破,一边在隔壁问大家觉得离婚男咋样啊有市场嘛 小馋牛   (42 bytes , 63reads )
觉得不该问,但是还是很好奇,实在忍不住想问 sunnylau2   (17 bytes , 73reads )
楼上地图炮啊... 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 44reads )
哪有?纯属好奇... sunnylau2   (0 bytes , 41reads )
个人觉得 行李寄存服务   (93 bytes , 51reads )
第一步 离婚 第二步 分家产 飞流不会走   (0 bytes , 52reads )
离吧... 最后满足一下她得需求, 你懂得 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 48reads )
这是个公共马甲么? Cogitoergosum   (107 bytes , 58reads )
晕倒,是要杀ID的前奏吗?我还是把我的贴移一下。 赶超美日   (0 bytes , 46reads )
关于婚后财产的迷思 赶超美日   (3479 bytes , 63reads )
你给总结一下? 凡人   (0 bytes , 51reads )
公式:weightage of 65% (FC): 35% (NFC) 赶超美日   (3483 bytes , 358reads )
一句话总结:婚姻的长度。一般而言,短期各拿各的,超长期平分,越长越趋向平分。 赶超美日   (7013 bytes , 319reads )
Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2015] SGCA 2 赶超美日   (7852 bytes , 82reads )
ARX v ARY [2015] SGHC 55 赶超美日   (11314 bytes , 63reads )
ARL v ARM [2015] SGHC 61 赶超美日   (26764 bytes , 81reads )
是问了也不说 有问题   (111 bytes , 93reads )
强烈要求女主也来注册华新 ID 和楼主对峙 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 44reads )
这个很可能是女方觉得不靠谱 tracyfyy   (12 bytes , 53reads )
这就是不想好好过日子的节奏了 国大大叔   (6 bytes , 47reads )
女方缺乏安全感+1 彭太太   (42 bytes , 62reads )
沟通沟通 Mimisasa   (250 bytes , 86reads )
是男方问的,主动问的 有问题   (181 bytes , 91reads )
既然结婚不顾家人反对和你在一起,应该是有感情基础,不是很看中钱的 胖头鱼的喵喵   (210 bytes , 44reads )
用在哪里怎么也应该跟老公说一下吧 rabbitwf   (18 bytes , 50reads )
LZ,标点错误 micomama   (161 bytes , 72reads )
又见安全感。。。 Amazing   (65 bytes , 52reads )
存款属于婚后共有财产这一点在新加坡不成立。 love962397   (36 bytes , 85reads )
啊,这样么? micomama   (46 bytes , 57reads )
分了是双方同意。 love962397   (156 bytes , 57reads )
怪不得 有问题   (30 bytes , 79reads )
这也不一定啊! love962397   (154 bytes , 65reads )
是呀 jiatong32   (248 bytes , 66reads )
你这推理能力 micomama   (18 bytes , 48reads )
这不能推理出想离婚的结果吧 hdeksa   (40 bytes , 65reads )
哦, micomama   (8 bytes , 52reads )
一般这种情况还会结婚,大概是为了结婚而结婚 西门飘飘   (140 bytes , 84reads )
家庭开销由男方负责,我身边大多数女性都这么想,难道换一个会更好? yoselin   (0 bytes , 59reads )
好奇这个,开销全部男方负责,女方的钱呢,全是自己收着? date123   (200 bytes , 61reads )
有这样的人的。 love962397   (10 bytes , 52reads )
有这样的女生 路易十三   (240 bytes , 55reads )
开眼界了 date123   (0 bytes , 49reads )
所谓开销也是指家庭开销,水电网电视,家具等,一起在外面吃饭也是男方付钱 yoselin   (252 bytes , 64reads )
这算什么安全感啊 vililytan   (46 bytes , 55reads )
是啊,安全感是自己挣的,靠别人给的都不靠谱 date123   (70 bytes , 55reads )
一开始女方非常好 有问题   (134 bytes , 92reads )
这么快就被洗脑了? 依米   (217 bytes , 43reads )
所以说不被父母祝福的婚姻真的需要再三考虑。 eyes   (5 bytes , 60reads )
哎。。。 林小鱼s   (6 bytes , 59reads )