华新 - 关于婚后财产的迷思

关于婚后财产的迷思

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-18 09:28:54　楼主　关注此帖

【婚姻家庭】遇到这样的情况，你会怎么办婚前，丈母娘死活不同意，理由有几，学历不高只是本科，女方硕士，个儿头不高，170，女方158，工作不好，只是工程师，别人家男友是老板。　　婚后，女方在丈母娘的教育下，对钱非常敏感。家里所有指出，房贷，水电等等全部男方支出。女方家人来了，男方负责，男方父母来了，女方一分钱都没花。房间出租出一间，房租每次都被女方拿走，从婚后，女方唯一的贡献，就是给男方买了一件衣服。　现在男方基本月光，女方则存款无数。但是数额，用处全部不让男方知道。总有一种随时要跟男方离婚的感觉。　怎么破该帖荣获当日十大第1，奖励楼主25分以及37华新币，时间：2015-11-18 22:00:02。 (more...)

关于婚后财产的迷思

1. 新加坡妇女宪章

“matrimonial asset” means　—

(a)

any asset acquired before the marriage by one party or both parties to the marriage　—

(i)

ordinarily used or enjoyed by both parties or one or more of their children while the parties are residing together for shelter or transportation or for household, education, recreational, social or aesthetic purposes; or

(ii)

which has been substantially improved during the marriage by the other party or by both parties to the marriage; and

(b)

any other asset of any nature acquired during the marriage by one party or both parties to the marriage,

but does not include any asset (not being a matrimonial home) that has been acquired by one party at any time by gift or inheritance and that has not been substantially improved during the marriage by the other party or by both parties to the marriage.

所有婚后获取的财产（礼物或遗产除外）都是婚后财产（法律说一次就好，不需要三次）。什么“你的是我的，我的也是我的”在法律上只是笑话。

2. 案例

－ Google “2015 Family Law – Matrimonial Assets – Division site:singaporelaw.sg”

－一个个找　http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments　（离婚案例多数是缩写 vs. 缩写）

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-18 09:37:18　 2楼

[登录后回复]

在赶超美日的大作中提到：

关于婚后财产的迷思1. 新加坡妇女宪章 “matrimonial asset” means　— (a) any asset acquired before the marriage by one party or both parties to the marriage　—(i) ordinarily used or enjoyed by both parties or one or more of their children while the parties are residing together for shelter or transportation or for household, education, recreational, social or aesthetic purposes; or (ii) which has been substantially improved during the marriage by the other party or by both parties to the marriage; and (b) any other asset of any nature acquired during the marriage by one party or both parties to the marriage, but does not include any asset (not being a matrimonial home) that has been acquired by one party at any time by gift or inheritance and that has not been substantially improved during the marriage by the other party or by both parties to the marriage. 　所有婚后获取的财产（礼物或遗产除外）都是婚后财产（法律说一次就好，不需要三次）。什么“你的是我的，我的也是我的”在法律上只是笑话。　 2. 案例－ G (more...)

ARL v ARM [2015] SGHC 61

http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15936-arl-v-arm-2015-sghc-61

The undisputed matrimonial assets and their gross values are set out in the following table:

S/n	Matrimonial Asset	Value
1	Matrimonial Home (joint names)	$1,300,000^{[note: 15]} (per the Plaintiff’s valuation, which is the higher of the two)
2	The second condominium unit (the Plaintiff’s sole name)	$1,000,000^{[note: 16]}
3	The Plaintiff’s POSB Savings Account	$2,176.75^{[note: 17]} (as at 21 August 2013)
4	The Plaintiff’s CPF accounts: Ordinary Account (“OA”): $0 Medisave Account (“MA”): $37,043.24 Special Account (“SA”): $33,079.16	$70,122.40^{[note: 18]} (as at 29 August 2012)
5	The Plaintiff’s two insurance policies	Undisclosed surrender values
6	Nissan Latio (on hire purchase)	$ 16,257.00^{[note: 19]}
7	The Defendant’s POSB Savings Account	$2,194.29^{[note: 20]} (as at 18 December 2012)
8	The Defendant’s United Overseas Bank Uniplus Account	$9,540.10^{[note: 21]} (as at 1 July 2013)
9	The Defendant’s DBS Plus Account	$1,850.00^{[note: 22]} (as at 18 December 2012)
10	The Defendant’s CPF accounts OA: $928.17 MA: $21,638.70 SA: $532.94	$23,099.81^{[note: 23]} (as at 17 December 2012)
11	The Defendant’s five insurance policies 1)　　　　NTUC Income Enhanced Incomeshield Insurance Policy; 2)　　　　Aviva Ltd My Shield Policy; 3)　　　　Great Eastern Life Whole Life with Escalating Reversionary Bonus Policy; 4)　　　　NTUC Income Mortgage Protector Insurance; and 5)　　　　Manulife Financial Life Protector Plus Policy.	Undisclosed surrender values for four of the policies. The fifth policy has a surrender value of $120,000.^{[note: 24]}
Gross value of matrimonial assets	$2,545,240.35

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-18 09:39:31　 3楼

[登录后回复]

在赶超美日的大作中提到：

ARX v ARY [2015] SGHC 55

http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15924-arx-v-ary-2015-sghc-55 Pool of　

Pool of matrimonial assets as of 30 June 2012
Class of asset	Description	Value (as of 30 June 2012)
Property	Glasgow Flat	$232,464.10
Turkish Property 1	$64,728.90
Turkish Property 2	$56,286.00
Turkish Property 3	$61,914.60
Turunc Property	$70,357.50
Bank and CPF accounts	17 Accounts (see Annex 1 for an itemised breakdown)	$938,659.76
Car	Toyota Fortuner	$42,000.00
Others	Paintings, jewellery and shares (see Annex 2 for an itemised breakdown)	$9,398.37
Total	$1,475,809.24

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-18 09:41:59　 4楼

[登录后回复]

在赶超美日的大作中提到：

Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2015] SGCA 2

http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/court-of-appeal-judgments/15859-chan-tin-sun-v-fong-quay-sim-2015-sgca-2

Matrimonial Asset	Value ($)
Monies paid into Court following the sale of 30　Dafne Street, Singapore	1,906,085.44
Husband’s CPF Account 　　　　　　　Ordinary Account 　　　　　　　Medisave Account 　　　　　　　Special Account	238.22 1,500.06 12.12
Wife’s CPF Account 　　　　　　　Ordinary account 　　　　　　　Medisave account 　　　　　　　Retirement account	83.04 21.61 0
Husband’s OCBC Easisave Account No. XXXXXXXX9001 (“OCBC Easisave Account”)	192,892.85
Wife’s DBS Savings Account No. XXXXXX1784 (“DBS Savings Account”)	322.19
Total value of matrimonial assets	2,101,155.53

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-18 09:49:10　 5楼

[登录后回复]

在 Cogitoergosum 的大作中提到：

这是个公共马甲么？http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=108_13018957 http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/zbbs.php?B=108_13335775

晕倒，是要杀ID的前奏吗？我还是把我的贴移一下。

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-19 11:07:14　 6楼

[登录后回复]

在凡人的大作中提到：

你给总结一下？

一句话总结：婚姻的长度。一般而言，短期各拿各的，超长期平分，越长越趋向平分。

Loh Swee Peng v Chan Kui Kok　[2015]　SGHC　64

The factor which weighs most strongly with me is that this is, by any measure, a very long marriage. At the date of the hearing, the marriage had endured for 42 years. The longevity of the emotional, parental, social and economic bond between the spouses is to my mind a very weighty factor that overshadows all others. In particular, it causes the importance of the precise ratio of the parties’ direct contributions which were made decades earlier and which I am now attempting assess decades later on imperfect and incomplete evidence to recede into the background. The length of the marriage is a factor which points towards the just and equitable division of the matrimonial assets being an equal division.

Dong Jianrong v Jiang Huaguo　[2015]　SGHC　56

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye[2007] 3　SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one.

Wong Sook Kuen v Loh Choon Fah　[2015]　SGHC　36

Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye　[2007] 3　SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but　for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one. Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

AOB v AOC　[2015]　SGHC　13

The parties have been married for more than 20　years. Equality of division is neither ideal nor the norm (Lock Yeng Fun v Chua Hock Chye　[2007] 3　SLR(R) 520 at [55]), but for long marriages such as this, the courts tend to lean towards equality of division. That is because there is no formula or means to determine the differential between the financial and non-financial contribution of the parties with precision. An equal division is also probably the closest the court can effect the parties’ declaration in their matrimonial vow of treating themselves as one. Thus in the absence of a better formula, the court will consider equality as justice.

Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng　[2013]　SGHC　275

96 I observed that in most of the cases identified in the sample above, where the wife received 35% of the matrimonial assets, the marriage was generally less than 20 years. On the other hand, for marriages more than 20 years, the wife was awarded 40%.

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：赶超美日 (等级：5 - 略有小成，发帖：2267) 发表：2015-11-19 11:11:10　 7楼

[登录后回复]

在凡人的大作中提到：

你给总结一下？

公式：weightage of 65% (FC): 35% (NFC)

Teh Kah Weng David v Chow Lai Meng Nina　[2015]　SGHC　84

49　　　　　In this case, the Defendant provided　92.2%　of the financial contribution and　90%　of the non-financial contribution.

51　　　　　In the present case, I gave a weightage of 65% to the respective financial contributions and a weightage of 35% to the respective non-financial contributions of the parties.

52　　　　　Applying this weightage of 65% (financial contributions): 35% (non-financial contributions) to the Defendant’s financial contribution of　92.2%　and to the Defendant’s non-financial contribution of　90%, I obtained a “single overall ratio” of　91.43%

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 7 篇文章，分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页　 [1]　末页>>