无法说服父母不打。最多不出门。 他们非要打。

打疫苗还不如 就得了新冠（ 还是有敬畏之心）

只是从风险考量， 不支持不反对他们打。

It is not even approximately right .

但也是家人。

感觉年轻嘛 得了也没啥大问题

但是后来看到一个新闻说超过xx%打了就接近群体免疫了，就觉得自己还是打吧。
排除掉身体素质不好的，不能打的老年人，还有小孩子，为了实现xx%， 我们年轻人就去贡献分子吧，平时都当分母，也难得贡献一次分子 hahahah

老年人尤其有基础病的 确实要考虑慎重一点。

说还可以就是累。。。

亚历山大？ 也还好。


不知道这个疫苗什么意思。

伦敦就得了。

MRNA

我不会打

虽然打不打疫苗是个人自由，而且即使不打也不一定能得上，有私心不打完全理解，但是为了整体防疫考虑还是能打就尽量打。
至于有些人还怀疑疫苗安全性的，全世界都打了几亿了，如果有事人类就该灭绝了。

.z

MRNA 动作有点大。

打过了还可以打中国的？

More traditional inactivated virus vaccines on the contrary do not require cold storage, can be used in a wide variety of situations, are cheap and relatively easy to produce and their technology is tried and true. Their long-term effects can thus be better predicted. Moreover, their production can be done in many countries that lack the conditions needed to produce mRNA vaccines.

The Chinese vaccines are of this type. They were developed and produced in the same amount of time as the Western mRNA vaccines. But, whereas the mRNA vaccines are mostly limited to nations that are economically developed, can afford their high cost, and have the infrastructure needed to inoculate their populations, the Chinese vaccines can be easily used by less developed countries in the Global South who otherwise would have been left out in the cold.