Q4 胡伟良 vs 庄才钧
胡伟良 supporters post here (NM)
kurubear will be there
Q4 胡伟良 vs 庄才钧
庄才钧 supporters post here (NM)
Who can help type the chinese names of the 7 players? (NM)
Done! Managed to dig up from some of the postings (NM)
庄才钧 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
胡伟良 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
巫汉梃 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
施由炳 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
陈茗芳 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
林家勇 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
赵金山 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
廖铭濠 supporters post here (NM)
Good Luck! (NM)
是啊我以前也说过看好廖和林超贤原本以前也看好刘义豪但是由于进了JC下棋的时间肯定没有廖多。
这些棋手还很年轻，如能和高手多接触多培养，肯定可以再提高水平。这很可能会提高新加坡年轻棋手的功力。看象棋总会这么搞了。比如说一个大师或强甲分配成个BUDDY SYSTEM。还是像类似的想法。廖的棋再B组算好了功力在甲组算普通吧。廖的优势在他的年龄和他的心态。但如得到高手的培养和训练，以后代表新家坡参加世界杯应该就是他了。这也包括林超贤和黄俊阳年轻棋手等等。
感觉现在跟以前的水平比起要差很多。最早B组升两个棋手然后就慢慢升4个。现在一年能升8或多过8个棋手。这让新加坡甲组个人赛的水平下降。希望象总可以去注意这点。
Any ideas to improve the skill level of Grade B players instead ? ...
I noticed as the years pass by, more and more of these players seems to have difficulty joining the tournament. Having more players moved to Grade B will temporary stop this trend. However, if the gap of the newly promoted and current Grade B is too great, it will be a bad situation for all involved. So any ideas to push up these players's skill level probably would be more useful.
---kurubear
---kurubear
Study more, talk less.
You mean what kind of study? Group, buddy...? (NM)
HOWEVER, FINAL DECISION IS STILL SIXGA PREROGATIVE & SHOULD BE HONORED.
Agree ...
Based on the fact that the issue is not covered under any of the rules except Rule 14 under the tournament Rules & Regulation, the organiser will have final say to ensure what is best for the event. Hence, their decision is final and has to be respected based on their own set of reasons.
Even though there are some differing views of how to proceed with the Quaterfinals Round 8, these should be left to be reviewed should the organiser decide to proceed with current arrangement. By doing so, we don't miss out on the most important people in this tournament, the TOP8 players to give them encouragement and for us not to lose focus on what is important for CHIchess future in Singapore.
----kurubear
Even though there are some differing views of how to proceed with the Quaterfinals Round 8, these should be left to be reviewed should the organiser decide to proceed with current arrangement. By doing so, we don't miss out on the most important people in this tournament, the TOP8 players to give them encouragement and for us not to lose focus on what is important for CHIchess future in Singapore.
----kurubear
could all think from the position of 胡伟良 ........
could all think from the position of 胡伟良.
From the existing rules, only Top 8 of first 7 rounds are qualified for the 3 rounds of Final regardless 卷心菜 withdraw or not. Since the rule did not talk about cases of withdraw for the 3 rounds of Final, any changes now could result in the appeal of 胡伟良.
When we introduce any change, we need to study all points.
I believe SIXGA Committee of this Singapore Open Event (Rule No. 14) has considered all points before the release of pairings for Round 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last but not least, tomorrow evening, I will go and support the lady player 陈茗芳 and forget about the above issue .....
Agree, help the players focus on their important matches. (NM)
It is not only 胡伟良 if 庄才钧 is removed and put in 陈靖麟 ......
It is not only 胡伟良 if 庄才钧 is removed and put in 陈靖麟.
The new pairings should be …..
廖铭濠 vs 陈靖麟
施由炳 vs 赵金山
陈茗芳 vs 胡伟良
林家勇 vs 巫汉梃
Organiser(s) should know the situation best.
Usually, in any competition, we do not move the pole when the people are running..... one example is 2006 Singapore Open, two vacant positions were not filled up by moving up Positions 21 and 22. (for that year, up to first 20 could be promoted.)
If this is a replacement issue, then the pairing is not affected...
The 9th player is not part of the TOP8 but is to REPLACE the walkover player. This player can only be promoted only if s/he hold TOP3 ranking, 4th-8th not counted except prize money. This is not an easy task for this player. If we change the pairing then it goes against the TOP8 qualifying rules.
---kurubear
---kurubear
The only way to up the standard is to hold more competitionsBy holding more competitions, it would improve the chess feel of players. It is also crucial to find young talent at schools due to higher living standards inclined towards married couples. Compared to the past, more people are moving towards their career and family and spending less time on chess. My guess for this is because couples cannot do this together. It also depends on the nature of their jobs. Those working in banks as an analyst would obviously not have the time to take leave to play chess compared to a property or insurance agent.
In this case...
Could there be a tournament system that can be inclusive of them?
---kurubear
---kurubear
rules again, did u watch jack neo's movie " FOLLOW THE RULES "?
Is that the movie where they throw the ERP sign into the sea? (NM)
Amendments to the rule needed in this special case.....In view of the walkover, I do feel that it is unfair for a player to get 乙级 this way.
What I recommend is this, in order for a player to get promoted to 乙级, the player must achieve 1 win (excluding those achieved by walkover) in the knockout round.
Example, Player A gets into the semi final through walkover. Player A will not get 乙级 but still have to win in the semi final.
I hope SIXGA will seriously consider this recommendation as I feel last minute pull out is inevitable in a competition which last for weeks.
A good point and we have to think of ...
the poor player who's enemy walkover is not his fault. This is like an indirect penalty which is unfair to him. At this stage is a knockout not a round robin system.
Mr Hoang Dinh Hong of Viet Nam once taught me that in CHIchess look for the simplest, direct way to win. Based on the same logic, it probably is a better idea to keep the rules simple yet able to handle contingencies without unnecessary penalizing outside the player's control.
---kurubear
Mr Hoang Dinh Hong of Viet Nam once taught me that in CHIchess look for the simplest, direct way to win. Based on the same logic, it probably is a better idea to keep the rules simple yet able to handle contingencies without unnecessary penalizing outside the player's control.
---kurubear
Yup, that's the movie where at the end,breaking the rules help save many lifes.
Sorry, didn't watch the actual movie, only tralier, how did it save lives ? (NM)
华新中文网致力于为新加坡留学生、工作人士及华人同胞提供交流空间和服务平台
关于我们┊ 广告服务┊ 联系方式┊ 华新博客┊ 经典怀旧┊ 投递作品
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013
