from the game played xuyinchuan v.s zhou shi jie, i personally feel zhou shi jie did not play very well and xuyinchuan made lots of rough moves. i asked xu myself and he himself said that zhoushijie had lots of chances. Becaused xu had gave zhou shi jie coaching lessons b4 so i believe probably knew zhou's style of play better and he also had to win due to the team's situation. Move 74, black moved che 2 ping 5. if black move che 2 ping 6 red has no chance of winning infact i feel black is alittle better. Black che 2 6 ,red ma4-5, black che6 5, red che 3ping 6, black shi 5+ 4, red che 6-2, black ma 1+2 black is at slight advantage. Furthermore, Black's 76 move is the killer move for the whole game. He should move shi 5 + 4 instead of shi 5 + 6 the game can still be played.

From zhao ru quan's game versus sun yong zheng, move 37 zhao ru quan should move pao 7 ping 8 instead of pao 7 tui 2 black probably would move che 3 ping 2 or pao 1 ping 2, if che 3 ping 2, red pao 7 ping 4 red is at advantage. If pao 1 ping 2, red che 5 ping 8 exchange pao, red is also at advantage.

Xiejing's game, move 59 red should not che 8 + 2 and should pao 9 ping 5, red probably has a few variations but in all red still is at big advantage. pao 9 ping 5, black pao 3 + 7, red Shi 6+ 5, black che 1 tui 6, red che 8 - 1 red is at advantage.

peanut 请问你有在现场吗？
有了解赛场？比赛下完了你是在怪谁呢？假如你认为你棋高与我们以后你来下亚洲赛算了我不下给你下好吗？
你知道我们对台湾那盘假设黄荣岳赢了我们有第4或第5。那他那盘棋因为输了所以掉到第9
请你假如不了解情况不要再提过去的比赛扰乱比赛员的心情。

那特大的战绩好像是75%胜率至80%出场率
我个人战绩是4胜2和但好像对澳门那盘好像是不知道那些棋征稿都是不会下棋的那盘算我超时。因为下完棋复盘没去停钟。他们看的时间已经是（-）了而且赛前双方先签了名了。所以没去关心他们这么方但我很肯定我跟一个棋征说我和了。后来发现太晚了。但输了刚好是4胜1和1负75%刚好达到特大的胜率。

我没跟吴贵临拼命也是看他那盘棋有点优势不然中残可能要逼吴大师弃子复盘那个变化我未必好。赛后和黄荣岳复盘从开局阶段要到中局指出一步炮8+1优势不可动摇。当时他走的是炮 8退2。到了中局也是红棋主动但双方对攻很激烈黄荣岳时间比较紧。

我不同意棋一生的看法就是这次比赛即使派出最强的整容又能如何？黄荣岳那盘棋说实话是不应该输。那盘很严重输掉要掉好几个名次。赢了拿个第4或第5。这么说这也比上次新加坡去北京的成绩好多了。上次好像是第12吧。棋手包括黄俊明，赖汉顺。这次关键要怪运气不好最后一盘优势没好掌握。从现在新加坡的实力来看最好我看只有第4，香港和台湾明显都有吴和赵大师实力高于我们。比赛都下完了不是怪人和批评的时候。要批评我也要批评象总为什么没给新加坡棋手搞房间？新加坡是这样对待自己国家的棋手吗？根本就没有团体默契下完起都各自回家不知道对谁没有办法猜棋和讨论。每天自己搭公车匆匆忙忙来到比赛场就开始比了根本没时间讨论战略。

假如那些人认为他们棋高就在全国赛达好成绩不要亚洲赛后因为成绩欠佳乱乱批评。最看不起那些棋水老说那些风凉话的人了。

(i'm at work i can't type chinese)
Top priority for Singapore team is to get good results for the team itself and not for me to get my grandmaster title. it is also my top priority therefore this time to strategist the team well and in a different manner. I take red for certain teams to try to secure the 2 points first for the whole team. This strategy worked for nearly all teams, except Australia. For macau there was miscommunication as i thought zhuyongji was at home. If everything would have gone smoothly as planned, we would have gotten 5th which meant tht our strategy was not tht bad. Against China team i did not play has a few reasons one is to let ruizhan play more, 2 is to secure a winning percentage on my part.(This was the second priority for team singapore told to me by one of leaders.) I'm not obligated to waste my time and effort to explain to you even though i didn't play China. It is your right to have the freedom of speech, and my rights to decide how i should strategist the team to play well in this asia's cup. As u are not the person that has a say in deciding who gets to play for Singapore (anthony) you do not know the teams situation and ability better than him or any of us, so your suggestions would not be taken into consideration. Moreover it's over.

According to wangxinnan, it is not stated in the rules book. "It might be stated in future" but not yet. To me walking around has nohing wrong espcially to relax one's mind from the chess board given tense situations and pressure it helps relax my mind to look at other people's games so that we know what they move in the next few games. Are you saying that xiejing, sunyongzhen should also be "判输" when they look at my games espiecially xiejing which i'm closer to keep coming to view my games. If this rule is changed what about rules in china that play chess professionally? Obviously singapore's rules are flawed, i was asked to sit down and not be able to view my own team's games when i was at yishun taking part in one of their team events there. even my team mate was given a warning as he wanted to view our own teammates games. If it's a team event, players should be given the freedom to view their teammates own games to decide how to play their games as well as their opponents games. so that they know what openings their opponents move. I have ever witness a live china A division league competition and quite a number of players walk around so all should be "判输"? This includes lvqin and xuyinchuan. This time round i didn't see xuyinchuan view games very much though probably because he knows his chess is higher than everyone else.

I get your point. However from my view being a team event, i don't think i did anything wrong so your views would not be taken into my consideration unless it's embedded in the rules. viewing the games mostly of my team and taking afew glimpses of other teams games is perfectly fine to me as professionals in china no one gets a foul for viewing games. so why should there be an absurd rule that we get a foul for viewing our people's games since we're not even professionals. I believe that as long as i do not disturb my opponent(and yes unless my opponent states that me moving around affects him) it's ethically okie. Getting Grandmaster to me is a big thing. However i place my priority results of the Singapore team first. (Like me playing against china would make a difference to the whole team considering that all lost)

since i have upgraded my rank. However from my view i do not understand why we are not able to even view our teammates games during team events. China players were asked to sit down because they are in Singapore. It's a Singaporean Rule not an international rule. We should be given the right to view other people's games in order to decide how to continue playing. Whether to take a more defensive or offensive approach. Than to me it would be considered more like a team event.

disagree on yours but i won't also agree on what u think. For example, u mentioned to allow people that you think have a better ability than us to play for international competition. I totally disagree because i think that to give others a try they get a chance to improve and to gain more exposure. Sending the best player from my experience DOES NOT gurantee the better results.

Similarly to this case, i believe it helps me relax better under tense situations and get to strategise my situations better. Although i don't deny that my opponent might think like wise. I agree with what 多啦A梦 says, it is not for other people to view me as, it is what is inside me that shapes me. However from what Bishan has said, from their perspective as leaders of the chess association they are more concerned with 国家棋手代表的棋品形象 i can understand why. Being a Singapore representative i will give my word to constantly upgrade myself in areas that i lack. For people that are purposely trying to provoke or to create trouble with me, i suggest if u wanna do it, do it openly stop hiding behind your computer pls thank you.

I didn't really notice the time difference but from the opening i think zhu yong ji is at a disadvantage. I heard from Huang rong yue that at one point the time was 45 mins versus Zhu yong ji's 45 Seconds. Quite a big differnce i guess thats why he didn't see some crucial moves.

跟德荣聊过他说没影响到我拿特大就没有必要追究。原本想继续追问。但后来觉得有点太麻烦象总了就没追究了。
oh ya 我问了裁判特大是70%胜率not75%
所以towards my reply to 棋懦即使我对中国输了也是特大:P你吃什么酸葡萄啊？哈哈