so isnt it more likely that students graduate from top schools will go on to do well in life? (precisely why you want to send your own kids there) compared to the random probability of kids within 1km, would it be wrong to "conject" that alumni of top schools are more likely to have kids who will become good students than national average?
about the second point, i agree that these schools enjoys a lot of exclusive resources through GEP, but lookinh at the current social dynamics (lots of vested interest by alumni etc) would you deny that the schools owe these priviledges to their alumni?
my point about affiliation is this: an RJC alumni has lower place in the rafflesian family than a "pure-bred" rafflesian eg RGPS-RGS-RJC, so yes alumni "branding" starts in primary school.
about the last point, it is human nature and inevitable in all societies for elite enclaves to be formed. the all school equally good is just propaganda. government dont want to encourage that, and they tried ways and means to counter eliticism, but there is no way they can overhaul it.
---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 snowflamingo 的帖子 “I'm sorry I have to reply again”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/bbs.php?B=179_12359330
