µÇ¼ | Ê×Ò³ -> »ªÐÂÏÊÊ -> ʨ³Ç²Æ¾­ | Çл»µ½£º´«Í³°æ / sForum | Ê÷ÐÎÁбí
Scary chart
<<ʼҳ¡¡ [1]¡¡ Ä©Ò³>>¡¡

Scary chartΪʲô¸Õ²Å·¢²»³öÀ´? errr

[AXL (9-7 17:42, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]1Â¥

×Ô¼º¶¥ÉÏÀ´ ÖµµÃÒ»¿´µÄͼ²»ÊÇ˵һ¶¨»ácrash. Ö»ÊÇÏ£Íû´ó¼Ò±£³ÖÒ»µã±£ÁôÒ»µãrisk managementµÄÐÄ̬

(of course u can argue the market condition is different£¬ but this is not the point )
[AXL (9-7 17:57, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]2Â¥

If history is by any guide,MACD indicator (and other major ones) are actually have a dead cross near 28/Sep 1987 and 7th Oct 1987, which warned everyone long there.

But Now, DOW just had its major indicators crossed lovely at the bottom,

this is Point One.


And

Before that, people actually did their business as usual, without any panic selling like previous 2 weeks in US.


I think only a lot of evidents(N>=30) can establish one point from statistical point of view.


Hope there are other more evidences to convince people :)
[speculatist (9-7 17:59, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]3Â¥

(ÒýÓà speculatist:If history is by any guide,MACD indicator (and other major ones) are actually have a dead cross near 28/Sep 1987 and 7th Oct 198...)tat chart I saw it every time when correction comes!my udnerstading is " See Light Death" [xiaohu (9-7 18:01, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]4Â¥

(ÒýÓÃ speculatist:If history is by any guide,MACD indicator (and other major ones) are actually have a dead cross near 28/Sep 1987 and 7th Oct 198...)my point is not that history will repeatmy point is to remind ppl of risk.

anyway, we hav to be consistent in our logic to invest/speculate, i.e Why do we look at charts n technical indicators if we dun look at this? ^_^ (My taking is we dun look at either seriously, but i could hav argued the same thing 10 or 28 days ago n things panned out well, errr..against me)
[AXL (9-7 18:02, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]5Â¥

(ÒýÓà AXL:my point is not that history will repeatmy point is to remind ppl of risk. anyway, we hav to be consistent in our logic to inve...)sometime courage is everything!courage makes me 80% hold on 17Aug. [xiaohu (9-7 18:06, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]6Â¥

(ÒýÓÃ xiaohu:sometime courage is everything!courage makes me 80% hold on 17Aug. )no point justifying ur rational by what has happenedif u hav oppty making less risky money, no point having so much courage.

i hold my view this is not the time to take big view of mkt n pair/event trading shld dominate.
[AXL (9-7 18:10, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]7Â¥

(ÒýÓÃ AXL:no point justifying ur rational by what has happenedif u hav oppty making less risky money, no point having so much courage. i...)what I want to say had been repeated by many great investors in the history,I quote it below:

"people always have fear when they are supposed to have hope, and alwayse have hope when they are supposed to fear."

I am not a gambler, but I have courage.
[xiaohu (9-7 18:17, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]8Â¥

(ÒýÓÃ xiaohu:what I want to say had been repeated by many great investors in the history,I quote it below: "people always have fear when the...)this is generally true but not always truen yet again it missed the point -

u shldnt have fear at the wrong time doesnt mean u shouldnt hav fear

my view is, as posted below n in msg to speculist, neutral on singapore mkt. (but this doesnt mean i dun buy)

great investor takes long term view, which i dun doubt, but are do u think they "bottom fishing" now (if this is really the bottom)?

^_^ i suspect they probably hav built positions a few years back.

[AXL (9-7 18:23, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]9Â¥

(ÒýÓÃ AXL:this is generally true but not always truen yet again it missed the point - u shldnt have fear at the wrong time doesnt mean u ...)wow, I have no comment.there is no such thing like "real bottom" because all the bottom are temporary.

cutloss need courage, but buy dip needs more!
[xiaohu (9-7 18:31, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]10Â¥

¹ØÓÚ´Ëͼ£¬Çë¿´http://web.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=finance_best&MsgID=5203

1987ÄêµÄÊг¡´ó±ÀÅÌ×ÜÊÇÐÜÅÉ°®³­µÄÈÈÃÅ»°Ìâ,

ÏÖÔÚµÄÐÜÆø³åÌìºÍÈýÔ³õÊг¡¸Õ´óµøʱÊǺÎÆäÏàËÆ. ÄÇ»á¾ÍÒѾ­ÓÐÈ˶Ô1987 ºÍ2007 ×÷Á˶ԱÈ.
¿´¿´µ±Ê±µÄ¶Ô±ÈºÜÓÐÒâ˼, תÌùÈçÏÂ:


1987 versus 2007
I keep repeating I am not a fan of the 1987 parallel to 2007. I am not saying its impossible -- just less likely than other potential parallels (My choice is 1973, Doug Kass' is 1937).
Yet many readers keep drawing my attention to the 1987 conclusion. As a service to those of you who find this compelling, here is an overlay of the chart several of you have sent in.

Dow Industrials 1986-87 - 2006-07



[img]http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/images/2007/04/16/dow_8707_3.png[/img]


¿´ÉÏÈ¥ÕæµÄºÜÏÅÈË.


½á¹û,ÓкÃÊÂÕߺóÀ´ÓÖÖØÐÂ×÷Á˶ԱÈ, ²»Í¬µÄÊǹéÒ»³ÉͬÑùµÄ³ß¶È:


UPDATE: April 20, 2007 6:21am


This chart (courtesy of Charles) shows the scale of the run up between the two eras to be very different . . .

Dow 1987 and 2007, scaled to 100

[img]http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/images/2007/04/20/dow8707.jpg[/img]


Ô­À´ÓÐÕâô´ó²î±ðµÄͼ, Ò²¿ÉÒÔŪµÄÈç´ËÏàËÆ. (¶Ô±ÈÉÏͼ) Ö»Òª²»³É±ÈÀý¹ØϵµÄ·Å´ó¾Í¿ÉÒÔÁË.

ËùÒÔ, ²»Òª×Ô¼ºÏÅ×Ô¼º.
[¶à¿Õ·­ (9-7 23:37, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]11Â¥

(ÒýÓà ¶à¿Õ·­:¹ØÓÚ´Ëͼ£¬Çë¿´http://web.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=finance_best&MsgID=5203 1987ÄêµÄÊг¡´ó±ÀÅÌ×ÜÊÇÐÜÅÉ°®³­µÄÈÈÃÅ»°Ìâ, Ï...)ͼ



[¶à¿Õ·­ (9-7 23:40, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]12Â¥

(ÒýÓà ¶à¿Õ·­:ͼ ...)stk market is not science´æÔÚ¼ÈÊǺÏÀí ÓдÎͼ¾Í±íʾÓлáÈ¥¿´²¢ÇÒÕմ˲Ù×÷[AXL (9-8 2:08, Long long ago)] [ ´«Í³°æ | sForum ][µÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´]13Â¥


<<ʼҳ¡¡ [1]¡¡ Ä©Ò³>>¡¡
µÇ¼ | Ê×Ò³ -> »ªÐÂÏÊÊ -> ʨ³Ç²Æ¾­ | [ˢб¾Ò³] | Çл»µ½£º´«Í³°æ / sForum