È«ÇòÒøÐÐÊÐÖµÅÅÐаñÇ°Ê®ÖУ¬ÖйúÕ¼¾Ý4¸öϯλÓкβ»ºÏÀí£¿
µÇ¼ | ÂÛ̳µ¼º½ -> »ªÐÂÏÊÊ -> ʨ³Ç²Æ¾­ | ±¾Ìû¹²ÓÐ 5 Â¥£¬·Ö 1 Ò³, µ±Ç°ÏÔʾµÚ 1 Ò³ : ±¾ÌûÊ÷ÐÎÁбí : ˢР: ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³
×÷Õߣºhersvim (µÈ¼¶£º2 - ³õ³ö鮣¬·¢Ìû£º175) ·¢±í£º2009-02-16 21:48:40¡¡ Â¥Ö÷¡¡ ¹Ø×¢´ËÌû
ÖÜÆÀ-2ÔÂ14ÈÕ Íü¼ÇÀúÊ·¾ÍÊDZ³Åѱ¾ÖÜA¹ÉÊг¡ÎÞÊÓÍâΧ¹ÉÊÐ×ßÊÆ£¬¼ÌÐø×ß³ö¶ÀÁ¢ÐÐÇ飬²¢ÇÒÓÐЧͻÆÆ2100µã¾±Ïß룬´Ó¶øÎüÒýÇ÷ÊÆͶ×ÊÕߵĹºÂòÓûÍû¡£´Ó¼¼ÊõÉÏÀ´¿´£¬´óÅÌÒÔ¼°¸ö¹ÉÏÖÔÚÒѾ­³¬Âò£¬ÏÂÖÜÓе÷ÕûµÄÐèÒª£¬ÏÂÖÜÒªÌرð×¢ÒâÁ¿Äܵı仯£¬ÌرðÊÇËõÁ¿µÄʱºò¸üÐè½÷É÷¡£´ËÍ⣬±¾ÖÜÃÀ¹É¼ÌÐø×ßÈõ£¬²¢ÇÒÔÚ2ÔÂ12ÈÕÅÌÖÐÆÆ루ÓÐЧÐÔ´ý¶¨£©¡£ ±¾ÖÜÖصã¹Ø×¢µÄÌõÐÂÎÅ£º 1.Ò»Ô·ÝÐÂÔö´û¿î1.62ÒÚÔª£¬M2ͬ±ÈÔö³¤18.79% ÅÓ´óµÄÐÂÔö´û¿îÁ¿£¬ÏÔʾ³öÑëÐлúÔÚÄê³õÍ»»÷·Å´ûµÄÇ¿ÁÒÒâÔ¸£¬²¢ÓëÄ¿Ç°¹ÉÊеĶÀÁ¢×ßÊÆÓÐÒ»¶¨µÄÁªÏµ£¨Á÷¶¯ÐÔÔö¼Ó£©¡£µ«Êǽ϶à´û¿î¶î±»´óÆóÒµ×öÕ¼Ó㬶ø´óÁ¿ÃñÓªÖÐСÆóÒµµÄ×ʽð½ôÕŵľÖÃ沢ûÓеõ½ÓÐЧµÄ¸ÄÉÆ¡£ 2.Ò»Ô·ݳö¿Ú½ÏÈ¥ÄêͬÆÚÏ»¬17.5%£¬½ø¿Ú¼õÉÙ43.1%¡£ ³ö¿ÚÆ£ÈõÊÇÒâÁÏÖ®ÖеÄÊ£¬±Ï¾¹±¾±ÒÉýÖµ£¨×¢Ò⣺ÖÁ×òÌìΪֹ£¬ÃÀÔª¶ÔÈËÃñ±Ò»ãÂÊΪ6.8334£¬ÈËÃñ±Ò¶ÔŷԪΪ8.8045.¶øÖйú³ö¿Ú×î´óµÄóÒ׶ÔÏóÍ·Á½Ãû¾ÍÊÇÃÀ¹úºÍÅ·ÃË£©¶Ô³ö¿ÚóÒ×ÒÔ¼°Ïà¹ØÖÆÔìÒµµÄÓ°ÏìÊÇÏÔ¶øÒ×¼ûµÄ¡£¶ø½ø¿ÚµÄÏ»¬Ôò¶ÔÎÒÃǵķÖÎöÓÐןüΪÖØ´óµÄÒâÒå¡£ÖйúÔ¼ÓÐÒ»°ëµÄ½ø¿ÚÊÇÓÃÓÚ¼Ó¹¤³ö¿Ú²úÆ·µÄÔ­²ÄÁÏ£¬Ò²¾ÍÊÇ˵½ø¿ÚÆðµ½ÁËÁìÏÈÖ¸±êµÄ×÷Óã¬ËùÒÔ¶ÔÓÚ±¾ÖÜÖйúÕþ¸®³ǫ̈Õþ²ß½µµÍ·Ä֯ƷµÈ³ö¿ÚÍËË°µÄ×ö·¨£¬¾ÍºÜºÃÀí½âÁË¡£ 3.È«ÇòÒøÐÐÊÐÖµÅÅÐа (more...)
È«ÇòÒøÐÐÊÐÖµÅÅÐаñÇ°Ê®ÖУ¬ÖйúÕ¼¾Ý4¸öϯλÓкβ»ºÏÀí£¿
ÖÐÒƶ¯¿ÉÊÇÈ«ÇòµçÐÅÔËÓªÉÌNO.1
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æËùÓлظ´´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí
×÷Õߣºhersvim (µÈ¼¶£º2 - ³õ³ö鮣¬·¢Ìû£º175) ·¢±í£º2009-02-18 12:21:11¡¡ 2Â¥
I don't think China Mobile is No.1Refer to Fortune 500 list (http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2008/full_list/). China Mobile is only No. 148, or No. 8 in telecom industry Numbers? at&t Revenue 118.93 billion, profit 11.95 billion Telefonica Revenue 77.25 billion, profit 12.19 billion France Telecom Revenue 72.49 billion, profit 8.62 billion Vodafone Revenue 71.20 billion, profit 13.37 billion What about China mobile? Revenue 47.06 billion, profit 8.43 billion You can easily see the huge difference here.
talking about market cap here?
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æËùÓлظ´´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí
×÷Õߣºhersvim (µÈ¼¶£º2 - ³õ³ö鮣¬·¢Ìû£º175) ·¢±í£º2009-02-18 23:59:37¡¡ 3Â¥
Sorry that I misunderstood your pointAre you saying that since China Telecom's market value is the No.1 in the telecom industry, the "bigger" Chinese banks are also quite nature to have largest market value in the world?
if you check the pb
the valuation is quite reasonable, h-shares (latest pb)

china construction bank 1.4pb (bank of America exercised their call options at 1.2pb)
boc & citic bank 0.95pb
icbc 1.5pb
bank of communications 1.2pb
cmb 1.58pb

just ask a question: the chinese banks have the same toxic assets as citi/rbs/hsbc/etc have?
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æËùÓлظ´´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí
×÷Õߣºhersvim (µÈ¼¶£º2 - ³õ³ö鮣¬·¢Ìû£º175) ·¢±í£º2009-02-20 23:20:40¡¡ 4Â¥
Sorry may I know what is pb?I remember the toxic waste it is called non-conforming loans in China official announcement. The best things is there aren't so many CDOs, CDO^2s etc in China.
so what's your point?
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æËùÓлظ´´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí
×÷Õߣºhersvim (µÈ¼¶£º2 - ³õ³ö鮣¬·¢Ìû£º175) ·¢±í£º2009-02-27 13:35:43¡¡ 5Â¥
My point is that Chinese enterprise do not have the earning capability andpotential to be the No.1, at least currently.
china mobile's no.1 market cap already shows
its world no.1 earning potential
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æËùÓлظ´´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí
ÂÛ̳µ¼º½ -> »ªÐÂÏÊÊ -> ʨ³Ç²Æ¾­ | ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³ | ±¾Ö÷Ìâ¹²ÓÐ 5 ƪÎÄÕ£¬·Ö 1 Ò³, µ±Ç°ÏÔʾµÚ 1 Ò³ | »Øµ½¶¥²¿
<<ʼҳ¡¡ [1]¡¡ Ä©Ò³>>

ÇëµÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´£ºÕʺŠ¡¡ ÃÜÂë ¡¡