I am wondering why you are still talking a lot on 棋力 at this momentIs the issue about 棋力？ No, not at all ! You cannot simply evaluate a person by his棋力, but actually as we seen, you often did so For example,. You talked on the level difference between Cabbage and GM Ng, you said Master Kng is a lower Grade A player, you said Ji Du never got Top 8 in Grade A, and you named another player as 9-lose what, etc. Yes, all these you have mentioned before are ture, but It was not polite or respectful to be saying so. When you were talking about their weakness in 棋力, and ignoring their contribution to chess, how would you wish to win others’ respect? The more you talk on one thing, shows the more you care about the thing or the more you are accomplished in the thing. So is it because you care about 棋力 more than contribution, or you are accomplished in 棋力 but short of contribution? When you were not showing enough respect to their contribution or not enough 修养 to their 棋力, how would you wish to be (more...)