higher priority to look for 2004 data as compared to 2002 data ....
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 2 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:碧山 (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:1430) 发表:2008-08-20 09:26:32  楼主  关注此帖
抛砖引玉 ..........I am trying to get the lists of graded players for 2002 and 2004 新加坡全国象棋个人赛 so that we can have the records of 7 years for the study, otherwise, we could just use the records of 2005 to 2009 (next year) if SIXGA could decide on the maximum number of years is 5. To have a better system for Singapore Xiangqi Future, all xiangqi lovers should try to suggest whatever we could. Enough sharing of views from me in this matter. : ) (more...)
higher priority to look for 2004 data as compared to 2002 data ....

with 2004 data, we could start the study now if the maximum number of years is 6 or less. This could also provide information to help in the review of Bishan Grading System.

Furthermore, if we publish the 10-year data in 2012 when Bishan Xiangqi Club celebrating 10th Anniversary, we will need the data from 2003 to 2012.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:碧山 (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:1430) 发表:2008-08-21 12:50:56  2楼
No meaning to have 等级分 under the current situation ....... As mentioned by 作者:卷心菜 发贴时间:2007-05-12 17:42 in "既然会长先生抛砖引玉,我也说说自己的看法(长)" ........ 全国团体赛没了,狮城杯没了,曾士生杯没了,罗名士杯没了,宗乡会馆杯也看不到了.四,五年前我一年能下50盘全国范围的比赛,去年才下了不到10盘,真是痛心. ...... With only 9 rounds in Singapore Open, once a year, 等级分 is not a good method to compare the standards of the various graded players. What is the next best ??? To introduce more grades for the players ???
This is one of the reasons for us to encourage members to join ......

at least 3 competitions over a 5-year period.


http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=123_11053140
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 2 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码