May be is reason behind !
Other teams had put more focus on Boonlay ,White sand A/B and ended up 义顺南，甘邦格南 break through.
This can be analysis from 棋人生 posted articles "detailed Results of all 110 Boards".
Don't misunderstand that i am saying that their team are no good but is less challenge due to less focus.
Juz my points of views.
Welcome back. The score of one board could affect a lot ........
e.g. if smmasing won 李勇, Bishan could move up to 3rd position.
At all times, I do not consider this one day 2 rounds (2 boards) type of team competition could really show the standard level of all teams except if you are really the first team or last team, e.g. Catholic (at another level, my separate note on this too.).
But due to budget and time, this one day team event is still the "best way" for Singapore xiangqi clubs currently ???!!!
Actually, in my separate postings, I did suggest to use a 4 boards method one-day event, i.e. you need to have 4 boards between two teams ....
http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=123_10951092
At all times, I do not consider this one day 2 rounds (2 boards) type of team competition could really show the standard level of all teams except if you are really the first team or last team, e.g. Catholic (at another level, my separate note on this too.).
But due to budget and time, this one day team event is still the "best way" for Singapore xiangqi clubs currently ???!!!
Actually, in my separate postings, I did suggest to use a 4 boards method one-day event, i.e. you need to have 4 boards between two teams ....
http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=123_10951092
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013