followon questionThanks, VeryGood. The compiler really complains about non-static member functions as shown in error message.
My followon question is that: in a class defintion, there are acutally many non-static member function. Here the member function is private, does it matter? Is it possible to define a non-static private member function?
TIA
It seems that you are confused...
1) The sample you gave above is NOT a declaration of member function. Instead, the typdef statement simply aliases a data type of member function pointer as "Omf" for the ease of reference.
2) No matter farray is declared as static or not, the syntax is acceptable! That is, there is NO compelling reason that farray must be declared static. Please double check.
2) No matter farray is declared as static or not, the syntax is acceptable! That is, there is NO compelling reason that farray must be declared static. Please double check.
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013