公众号的这些数字是从哪里来的？所有的疫情数字原始来源应该都是MOH吧，楼主找到链接了吗？
又去查了MOH的数据
整个楼里，你还是比较理性的，所以我又重新回去核对了数据。我们当然可以质疑数字的真实性，对于太离谱的数据，就有必要检验其来源。我看这个数据是基本靠谱的，不是道听途说，作为一个小有影响力的公众号，在这么大的事情上也不至于敢瞎编数据。我刚才还专门去检索了卫生部的每日更新，的确没有找到同样的段落，但是总体是基本吻合的。卫生部的通告里说：
Over the last 28 days, of the 71,834 infected individuals, 98.6% had no or mild symptoms, 1.1% required oxygen supplementation, 0.1% required ICU care, and 0.2% has died.
同一个通告里另一段说
Over the last 28 days, 98.6% of local infected cases were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms, 1.1% required oxygen supplementation, and 0.1% had been in the ICU.
71834的总病例数跟公众号里的“70192起本土病例“是基本吻合的。0.1%曾经进入ICU也是吻合的。
反而是MOH的通告里一幅图上，显示的是70832，跟自己的正文有1千多的差距。
Over the last 28 days, of the 71,834 infected individuals, 98.6% had no or mild symptoms, 1.1% required oxygen supplementation, 0.1% required ICU care, and 0.2% has died.
同一个通告里另一段说
Over the last 28 days, 98.6% of local infected cases were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms, 1.1% required oxygen supplementation, and 0.1% had been in the ICU.
71834的总病例数跟公众号里的“70192起本土病例“是基本吻合的。0.1%曾经进入ICU也是吻合的。
反而是MOH的通告里一幅图上，显示的是70832，跟自己的正文有1千多的差距。
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013