我每次打的都要预先在streetdirectory上查询路线
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 2 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:Dreamer (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:317) 发表:2013-11-10 22:12:47  楼主  关注此帖
【吐槽八卦】 在新加坡打的,大家有没有被宰过?今天去新加坡动物园,在mandai lake边上那个。从西海岸打的去只要了13元。走的路线是从clementi avenue6 然后一段pie,一段bke就到了。司机是个老伯,问我们要走哪里,我们说不知道。他就自己选了一条近路。可是回来的时候也遇到一个老伯,没有问我们要走哪里,我们也比较困,上车我睡着了,我老婆没睡,带着孩子。等我醒来,车走到cte的末尾,快到mariela bay那边,我感觉弯了很大一个弯了。但是再跟他说也没用,反正是要从aye上回来了。结果开到家用了刚好两倍的钱26元。然后下车时我跟他说我们去只用了13,为什么回来不走bke,他说没有13的,意思是不可能13.但是明显感觉是心虚吧,马上说你看着给吧。我看他是老人就说给你15吧,后来给了16,他没说话走了。后来我老婆认为也许冤枉了老人家,还怪我不体谅人家。应该给26算了。或者应该一开始我们说好路线。到了又少给好像我太强势。   我想问问,各位有没有打的被黑过?还是新加坡司机都不会坑人,这个回来的路就得这么走?或者就应该提前说好路线,如果没说,人家绕了远路,也不应该追究了?   本来在动物园玩的很高兴,回来这么一下,就好像突然吃了个苍蝇。不过,给了他16我觉得对得起他了。不知 (more...)
我每次打的都要预先在streetdirectory上查询路线
坐车的时候再告诉他应该怎么走,或者如果来不及预先查询,则说请走最近的。但是每次我都一定要发票,给自己投诉的机会。到目前为止没有被宰过。
This is me.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:Dreamer (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:317) 发表:2013-11-10 22:27:49  2楼
【吐槽八卦】 在新加坡打的,大家有没有被宰过?今天去新加坡动物园,在mandai lake边上那个。从西海岸打的去只要了13元。走的路线是从clementi avenue6 然后一段pie,一段bke就到了。司机是个老伯,问我们要走哪里,我们说不知道。他就自己选了一条近路。可是回来的时候也遇到一个老伯,没有问我们要走哪里,我们也比较困,上车我睡着了,我老婆没睡,带着孩子。等我醒来,车走到cte的末尾,快到mariela bay那边,我感觉弯了很大一个弯了。但是再跟他说也没用,反正是要从aye上回来了。结果开到家用了刚好两倍的钱26元。然后下车时我跟他说我们去只用了13,为什么回来不走bke,他说没有13的,意思是不可能13.但是明显感觉是心虚吧,马上说你看着给吧。我看他是老人就说给你15吧,后来给了16,他没说话走了。后来我老婆认为也许冤枉了老人家,还怪我不体谅人家。应该给26算了。或者应该一开始我们说好路线。到了又少给好像我太强势。   我想问问,各位有没有打的被黑过?还是新加坡司机都不会坑人,这个回来的路就得这么走?或者就应该提前说好路线,如果没说,人家绕了远路,也不应该追究了?   本来在动物园玩的很高兴,回来这么一下,就好像突然吃了个苍蝇。不过,给了他16我觉得对得起他了。不知 (more...)
贴一篇我2005年在海峡时报看到的,印象很深刻的打的被宰投诉信
当时还是学生,读了这个长篇投诉信,影响很深刻,于是保存电脑直到如今。
是三个外国游客写的。他们在机场打的被宰,后来发现了很生气于是向各个部门投诉,也写信到Straits Times的Forum。官方回复我没有保存,但是记得是陪了钱给他们。
我觉得他们写的投诉信很好,值得学习,在此和大家分享:

The Straits Times (Singapore)

Cabby touts damage Singapore's reputation

June 24, 2005 Friday

Jason Grafstrom Canada, Hamza Cakir Turkey and Deborah Lundberg (Ms) USA

WE ARE three visitors from Canada, Turkey and the United States. First, let us say that our time spent in Singapore has been wonderful. The city is beautiful, the people are friendly, and the food is exotic.

However, our Singapore experience has been scarred by some dishonest taxi drivers. All three of us had identical experiences. Our tale of woe and deceit started at Changi Airport. After we collected our bags and entered the arrivals hall, we were approached by taxi drivers offering their services.

We told them our destination and they quoted us a price of $35 to $50. It was not until we reached our hotel that we found out that we had been cheated.

Our hotel is in Katong and a taxi ride from Changi Airport costs only about $9 on the meter. Even with the airport, midnight and peak-hour surcharges, the total fare would only be between $12 and $20.

We believe the cabbies have broken the rules and the law:

They are supposed to queue up with their vehicles in the taxi queue at the arrivals hall.

They stand around inside the arrivals hall, offering their services. This is touting.

They offer a fixed fare and charge exorbitant amounts. This is scalping.

Some of the vehicles are not even taxis but private-hire minivans masquerading as taxis.

Chats with fellow hotel guests revealed that this is a common occurrence at Changi Airport.

With the help of the hotel management, we lodged written and verbal reports with the Singapore Tourism Board (STB), the Land Transport Authority (LTA), the taxi companies and Changi Airport police. The responses we received have been bureaucratic and ineffectual.

The STB said that this is not within its jurisdiction and told us to report the matter to the LTA and the taxi companies, which in turn said they would investigate but have produced no follow-up action. Airport police told us that there are patrols in the arrivals hall but clearly there has been insufficient policing action.

We recommend that the following action be taken:

Changi Airport police should have uniformed patrols and plainclothes officers working undercover in the arrivals hall.

The police should conduct sting operations, with officers acting as tourists, to apprehend the culprits.

Taxi drivers who are found guilty of touting and overcharging should have their taxi and driving licences revoked, and fined and jailed.

A database of dishonest taxi drivers should be set up and shared among taxi companies and regulatory agencies.

Signs in multiple languages warning tourists of such predatory behaviour should be displayed prominently in the arrivals hall.

We write as concerned friends of Singapore. After experiencing the warmth and hospitality of Singaporeans, it is a great shame that a small minority is inflicting such damage to the reputation of the country.

Singapore will be hosting the 117th session of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) next month. With 5,000 delegates and journalists coming from over 200 countries and territories, and a billion people watching events in Singapore, we shudder to think of the damage these cabbies will do to Singapore's good name.

We wonder what the consequences would be if the president of the IOC, Mr Jacques Rogge, has the misfortune of taking a ride with an errant cabby. But maybe not. Dr Rogge could end up taking the bus.

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 2 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码