¿´µ½ÌÖÂÛ·ï»ËÄУ¬ÎÒµÄÒ»µã¿´·¨ËùÓÐÓÐС×ÊÇãÏòµÄÅ®Éú£¬¶¼Ó¦¸Ã¶Å¾øºÍ·ï»ËÄÐÔÚÒ»Æð¡£µÚÒ»£¬·ï»ËÄеijɳ¤±³¾°×¢¶¨ËûÔÚÉú»îÉϱȽϽÚÊ¡£¬¼´Ê¹Äã²»»¨ËûµÄÇ®£¬Ëû¿´µ½ÄãÂò¶«Î÷Ò²»áÐľªÈâÌø£¬ÓÐЩ·ï»ËÄоÍÈç¥ϼ¸¸öÌû×ÓÀïÃæËù˵µÄ£¬¶ÔÓÚÇ®²ÆÌرðÓпØÖÆÓûÍû¡£²»µ¥µ¥ÏëÒª¿ØÖÆËûµÄÇ®£¬»¹ÓÐÄãµÄÇ®¡£ Æä´Î£¬·ï»ËÄеļÒÈËÒ²ÊDz»ºÃÏà´¦µÄ¡£ÒòΪ½ÌÓý±³¾°µÄÔÒò£¬ºÜ¶à·ï»ËÄеļÒÈËÂùºáÆðÀ´ÊǺֲܿÀµÄ¡£Èç¹ûÄãºÍ·ï»ËÄÐÓгåÍ»£¬²»ÒªÏëËûµÄ¼ÒÈË»áÕ¾ÔÚÄãÕâ±ß¡£
ËùÒÔÕâÄêÍ·£¬Ãŵ±»§¶ÔÊÇÍõµÀ¡£ С×ÊŮһ¶¨ÒªÕÒÒ»¸öС×ÊÄУ¬Ð¡Å©ÄÐÒ»¶¨ÒªÕÒ¸öСũŮ
a! good but
the intriguing dichotomy in your last paragraph is not exhaustive, some categories are inevitably left out. If, as evinced in your statement, only male/female members from bourgeois and peasantry are concerned, do you mean that members from gentry and proletarian are out of your scope? nevertheless your sonorous conclusion should be totally acknowledged.