很多棋手我相信也不敢说一定要夺冠。这也包括我在内。但是据有个梦想是好但是下棋要现实。要知道自己的能力在哪。不然会带来很多失望影响整个比赛。
我的目标比你简单，他不是直接夺冠军。3年前和3年后的目标都是一样。那就是盘盘发挥自己拥有的水平就可以满意了。

跟你在clubxiangqi下过三局，感觉你棋路很凶。

1。爱进攻而忽略防守。面对对手防守时，表现厌恶。
2。爱弃子，不爱下无车，可能中局强过残局。
3。非中炮布局的理解还有进步空间。

如果想进步的话，应该在柔棋方面下手。否则将会载在棋风绵密，残局较好的棋手下。

以上纯粹只是我个人的想法。

my mentor say if I play elephant or kung-fu style opening, I risk stampede by my own elephant because the direction and control of the game is very precise. If it is playing as Black then is ok because of its lower risk. The pressure is on Red player mainly. So, for now, the simple 5-phao is my good friend for next few months at least. :-)

--kurubear

In the end lost 2 games ugly and got posted for everyone to see.

这个不错，我也定个理想吧，明年争取拿个冠军 --- 新加坡小学生个人赛冠军

also treat like quick grasp of elephant opening to get ideas of its pros/cons and see if can use when i attack using 5-phao. Help me learn this opening really must go into mountain and invest long time to master and really must research specialised mid-games (not 5-phao kind) and mental power/patience. Anyway, I have mentor and senior do crashcourse review so i can get quick idea. But they say its kind of mid-game not suitable for me at the moment. Exposed my weak mid-game when the pieces depend on tactical play (constant high usuage of chess advanced theory)instead of simplier positional play.

The breakthrough can be unexpected and unrecoverable mostly with gain/lose of 1 piece. The requirement for overall game awareness is very high on top of the depth of research needed before the tournament. Without kung-fu style midgames and abundant endgame experience will be very disadvantaged especially in time-based tournaments. So confirmed not good for beginner like us.

If we take black and use this opening then is ok for us :-). Pressure is on Red.

---kurubear

Based on recent years research, the most productive years is 10-35 years old.

---kurubear

have assasination tools or not-in-form enemies or make use of tournament rules ... etc.

Wonder how the top players prepare for it ?


---kurubear

everytime I keep using the same opening which he think no one will use in tournament. So far, he is the only Singapore Grade A player I can find to try to expose weakness in my game. No other players we played with are able to use chess theory to counter our opening. I dunno how/where the rest of Grade A actually train.


Exposed weak games to others is good. Then

[1] people can learn, in XQ, the kind of opening you use can make break your game even before you start.
[2] when you improve, people will be impressed
[3] Make potential enemies look down on you and don't treat you as a threat.
[4] For strategic reasons, like testing the player skill, not exposing your full level (many first time enemies I play with me with only 60% power including this year Group B winner) or intentionally losing to avoid a stronger player etc
[5] Lose for other people to see (dunno why though)

These are some of the reason the veterans here teach me :-)

---kurubear





--kurubear

说要夺冠，有的棋手会不服气。这些棋手里面，有的会急着胜吕大侠，容易轻敌，自然给他机会；有的会加倍小心，对他则是一种阻力。可说有得有失吧。不过话说回来，如果对手能够更认真地下一盘，堂堂正正地作实力的比拼，也未尝不是一件好事情。

以刚克柔未尝不可，但克不尽时，还是需要一点柔功的。强攻易和，想争冠军不可不察。

吕大侠也非常厉害，曾经在个人赛中战胜过吴宗翰。

NM

反而有时候自己想争冠会去拼命导致输棋。这也是为什么强手比较喜欢多轮比赛。7+2制度下起来我觉得有时候自己下得挺窝囊。又不能输，也不想和。有时候互相矛盾影响棋局。
最重要还是自己的发挥。不要靠对手轻敌取胜。如对强手被轻敌而取胜，输给弱或中手那么应该对形势更被动。

NM

don't look like a honourable thing to do. I think you also don't want people post in your name without your permission.



---kurubear

第一位是钱永建
第二位是熊国伟