(引用 shearwater:弃如敝屣将海峡时报， 联合早报等狮城久负盛名的媒体倒贴剥离， SPH彻底沦落成了一家二流房地产公司，还美其名曰剥离不良资产，真是神操�...)sph=Singapore property holding？没毛病啊？ [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [医药法规 (5-7 13:16, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]21楼
(引用 shearwater:弃如敝屣将海峡时报， 联合早报等狮城久负盛名的媒体倒贴剥离， SPH彻底沦落成了一家二流房地产公司，还美其名曰剥离不良资产，真是神操�...)层主太厉害了，政府这么隐秘的阴谋都能看出来层主必须为了广大中小股民的利益带领大家投反对票。
层主必须是带头大哥了，喊声大哥[hongmeng (5-7 13:19, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]22楼
大将军高明啊！[甘言悦人 (5-7 13:22, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]23楼
(引用 甘言悦人:大将军高明啊！)皇上更英明威武[hongmeng (5-7 13:31, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]24楼
(引用 hongmeng:层主太厉害了，政府这么隐秘的阴谋都能看出来层主必须为了广大中小股民的利益带领大家投反对票。 层主必须是带头大哥了，喊声大哥)大家都投反对票吧 这个操作太笨蛋了[安家东盟号 (5-7 20:41, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]25楼
替罪羊已经浮出水面这哥们还不引咎辞职？
SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung's 'umbrage' reaction 'unfortunate': K Shanmugam
Sat, 8 May 2021, 5:51 pm
SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung at a press conference on 6 May 2021 announcing SPH Media's restructuring. (SCREENCAP: Weixiang Lim/Facebook via The Straits Times/YouTube)
SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung at a press conference on 6 May 2021 announcing SPH Media's restructuring. (SCREENCAP: Weixiang Lim/Facebook via The Straits Times/YouTube)
SINGAPORE – The "take umbrage" reaction of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) chief executive officer Ng Yat Chung when SPH's editorial integrity was questioned recently at a press conference it called for was "very unfortunate", said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam.
Speaking on the sidelines of a community event on Saturday (8 May), Shanmugam said to local media that "Mr Ng’s reaction and the way he answered the question... was very unfortunate," according to a report by Today.
"His outburst can be described in stronger terms. But I want to be careful and understated, because SPH is a listed company (with) shareholders, management, and I need to be careful," he added.
Ng's comments have since gone viral, with multiple businesses taking advantage of the furore to promote their products and services.
At the press conference on Thursday, SPH announced that it will be moving its media business into a not-for-profit entity, which will eventually be restructured into a company limited by guarantee. This will allow it to receive funding from private and public sources, including extra financial support from the government.
The move to restructure SPH's media business comes as its core segment's revenue and profit continued to plunge amid falling advertisement revenue.[shearwater (5-9 11:05, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]26楼
(引用 shearwater:替罪羊已经浮出水面这哥们还不引咎辞职？
SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung's 'umbrage' reaction 'unfortunate': K Shanmugam
Sat, 8 May 2021, 5:5...)现在很多网民在呼吁他辞职了 有些军队出来的老板不太会说话办事有点像当时选举时PAP推选出来的那个吉宝船厂的准议员
这个家伙侵犯了小股东这么多利益，还态度那么傲慢[BenXia (5-10 8:24, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]27楼
(引用 安家东盟号:大家都投反对票吧 这个操作太笨蛋了)I would have thought that SPH should receive millions in hiving the media busineInstead SPH has to pump in $80 million of cash and transfer a certain number of its shares and that of SPH REIT. In this scenerio SPH is paying to get rid of the media business. Why not just cease the media business and shut it down!!!. Whoever is interested in the media business should take it over and pay SPH.I cannot fathom why SPH has to hive it off and pay for this exercise.
Not only should the CEO resign over the management of SPH but the whole Board of Directors who has appointed him and installed him as the CEO.
It is time that the Board be called to account and take responsibility for the management of SPH.
It is also time that the authorities take a proactive and robust approach to impove the effectiveness of corporate governance of all listed companies including SPH.The board of directors should not be a club for friends, cass and school mates, relatives or to repay past favours.It is time to include a least a representative from the minority shareholders. At present, independent directors are SUPPOSSED to protect the interest of the minority shareholders but in reality do they?
Now that this debacle has surfaced it is only honorable although not gentlemanly for the CEO to resign. Whether or not the other board members would resign would much depend on his or her conscience in evaluating how he or she has contributed to this state of affairs of SPH. [BenXia (5-10 8:26, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]28楼
(引用 BenXia:现在很多网民在呼吁他辞职了 有些军队出来的老板不太会说话办事有点像当时选举时PAP推选出来的那个吉宝船厂的准议员
这个家伙侵犯了小股�...)冷静来想，也许是长期利好呢？就好比壮士断腕， 一次性损益
把哪年报中最大的亏损因子和不赚钱业务剔除
以后就海阔天空任翱翔
毕竟小股东持有的还是要赚钱的公司，
而且未来公司不需要背负媒体所背负的“道德枷锁”，随便怎么“凿“ 都可以
投票没有用的，既然无力反抗，不如试着接受甚至享受-趁机抄个底也好啊。
股市上将讲感情，结果就是亏钱。
声明:本人现在并不持有，也不打算在近期持有任何SPH的股票。
就酱
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[医药法规 (5-10 8:36, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]29楼
(引用 医药法规:冷静来想，也许是长期利好呢？就好比壮士断腕， 一次性损益
把哪年报中最大的亏损因子和不赚钱业务剔除
以后就海阔天空任翱翔
毕竟小股东...)还有，剥离主要业务不是CEO的职权，他最多是建议
最后还是
vanguard和Lee foundation等说了算
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[医药法规 (5-10 8:40, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]30楼
(引用 医药法规:冷静来想，也许是长期利好呢？就好比壮士断腕， 一次性损益 把哪年报中最大的亏损因子和不赚钱业务剔除 以后就海阔天空任翱翔 毕竟小股东...)房地产公司PB都很低 这个二线甚至3线地产公司不sexy[BenXia (5-10 8:45, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]31楼
(引用 医药法规:还有，剥离主要业务不是CEO的职权，他最多是建议 最后还是 vanguard和Lee foundation等说了算)坡县股市也是神奇一半的主营业务被剥离，股价只波动不到20%，所以还好啦 [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [医药法规 (5-10 8:45, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]32楼
(引用 shearwater:你可真是 张口就来大股东侵占中小股东利益的按理数不胜数， 你居然还在那天真的说风险利益平等，也真是无语了。 另外，谁告诉你 temasek ...)同意[Flag888 (5-10 8:46, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]33楼
(引用 BenXia:房地产公司PB都很低 这个二线甚至3线地产公司不sexy)设想另一种情况不讲剥离，而是拆分，按业务比例，拆为
报业控股和产业控股（目前业务比例是大约50:50，股价也一半一半）
小股东会怎么选，怎么反应呢?
看来它们应该先找我顾问一下，呵呵
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[医药法规 (5-10 8:58, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]34楼
(引用 医药法规:设想另一种情况不讲剥离，而是拆分，按业务比例，拆为
报业控股和产业控股（目前业务比例是大约50:50，股价也一半一半）
小股东会怎么选�...)如果拆分，大家就一定会觉得是大利好股价会双涨吧
有意思
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[医药法规 (5-10 9:00, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]35楼
(引用 医药法规:设想另一种情况不讲剥离，而是拆分，按业务比例，拆为
报业控股和产业控股（目前业务比例是大约50:50，股价也一半一半）
小股东会怎么选�...)不赞成 这跟白天抢钱差不多联合早报和海峡时报一点价值都没有么
卖起来也可以10来个亿吧
就这样拱手送人，还要给8千万启动花[BenXia (5-10 9:07, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]36楼
(引用 BenXia:不赞成 这跟白天抢钱差不多联合早报和海峡时报一点价值都没有么 卖起来也可以10来个亿吧 就这样拱手送人，还要给8千万启动花)所以它们没想明白应该拆分成两个上市公司，就皆大欢喜了？ 呵呵[医药法规 (5-10 9:15, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]37楼
(引用 医药法规:所以它们没想明白应该拆分成两个上市公司，就皆大欢喜了？ 呵呵)好的做法是？报控股集团-纸公司，不上市，下面两个集团
1）报业控股经营媒体业务
2）产业控股经营媒体外其他业务
都上市
现状就是，
报业 （51%），成本高，收益低，亏损严重
产业和其他（49%）， 成本低，收益还好， 利润部分全部补助了报业 -产业部分的投资业务， 收益一直不佳[医药法规 (5-10 9:23, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]38楼
(引用 BenXia:不赞成 这跟白天抢钱差不多联合早报和海峡时报一点价值都没有么 卖起来也可以10来个亿吧 就这样拱手送人，还要给8千万启动花)西门子手机业务卖给台湾当初也是倒贴，现在如何？[医药法规 (5-10 9:24, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]39楼
(引用 shearwater:替罪羊已经浮出水面这哥们还不引咎辞职？
SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung's 'umbrage' reaction 'unfortunate': K Shanmugam
Sat, 8 May 2021, 5:5...)看了那个视频老板好大的官威
挺有意思的，哈哈
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[mirage (5-10 9:37, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]40楼