没看懂什么人行道修到马路边遮阳的那个东西？那东西好像是市政理事会修的吧？和LTA没啥关系。。。[吴越浪子 (10-20 0:03, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]21楼
人可以过但要让车全新加坡那么多路口，都建斑马线，红绿灯，车就没法走了。而且斑马线本身也容易出事，容易造成不看车理所当然的问题。
在视野清晰，没有什么安全隐患的问题下，行人可以利用安全的traffic gap，直接过马路。除非附近有规定的过马路设施，比如天桥，红绿灯，斑马线，不然都是可以直接过的。
简而言之，没有crossing的情况下过马路，人要让车，但是车也得小心。
[本文发送自华新iOS APP]
[Daydayup666 (10-20 0:04, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]22楼
(引用 Daydayup666:人可以过但要让车全新加坡那么多路口，都建斑马线，红绿灯，车就没法走了。而且斑马线本身也容易出事，容易造成不看车理所当然的问题。 ...)完全错误在没有交通标志的地方，行人（弱势方，按先后顺序）有最高路权，法律有规定的例外，如消防车，救护车在执行认为途中（需要鸣号） [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [笑天 (10-20 9:04, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]23楼
这种路口不是应该找一个就近的有红绿灯或者有斑马线的地方再过马路吗？ [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [qjkk (10-20 9:22, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]24楼
(引用 笑天:完全错误在没有交通标志的地方，行人（弱势方，按先后顺序）有最高路权，法律有规定的例外，如消防车，救护车在执行认为途中（需要鸣号）)请问层主的法律依据的出处？[TPMT (10-20 14:34, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]25楼
(引用 笑天:完全错误在没有交通标志的地方，行人（弱势方，按先后顺序）有最高路权，法律有规定的例外，如消防车，救护车在执行认为途中（需要鸣号）)Pedestrians, etc., not crossing at pedestrian crossing to yield to traffic“pedestrian crossing” means any part of a road, subway or bridge established for the use of a cyclist, mobility vehicle user, PMD rider or pedestrian crossing the road, and indicated as such by traffic signs, signals and road markings as shown in any of the diagrams in Part I of the Schedule;
摘抄自road traffic act。帮你讲的简单点就是，除了红绿灯，斑马线，天桥，地下道这种规定的过马路设施，其他地方过马路，人都要yield to traffic
[本文发送自华新iOS APP]
[Daydayup666 (10-20 17:49, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]26楼
(引用 Daydayup666:Pedestrians, etc., not crossing at pedestrian crossing to yield to traffic“pedestrian crossing” means any part of a road, subw...)这个是解释啥是人行横道吧indicated as such by traffic signs, signals
没有人行横道也没有交通标志怎么办？再查一下
不过需要解释一下,俺的照不是本地考的，相信规则一样
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[笑天 (10-20 18:21, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]27楼
(引用 笑天:这个是解释啥是人行横道吧indicated as such by traffic signs, signals
没有人行横道也没有交通标志怎么办？再查一下
不过需要解释一下,...)好吧 坡县确实不一样以后不开车小心
开车可以横冲直撞
哈哈
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
[笑天 (10-20 18:35, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]28楼
(引用 笑天:好吧 坡县确实不一样以后不开车小心
开车可以横冲直撞
哈哈)Why don't pedestrians have right of way in Singapore?Singapore does have a unique situation on the roads. Unlike, say, the US where drivers in some areas (e.g. quiet suburban neighbourhoods) will stop to let pedestrians cross (even if it's jaywalking) or in much of the rest of Asia where pedestrians and vehicles alike wander onto the roads and pretty much avoid each other while accepting the right of either party to be there, pedestrians wait until cars have passed before they venture onto the road, and cars won't stop if they see someone waiting to cross. But there is an exception (see point 4 below).
Singaporeans are:
1. Impatient - given a choice to proceed or to wait, they would rather proceed.
2. Kiasu - they hate being second, and want to be in front, and also prevent others from being in front.
3. Bullies - given points 1. and 2. above, drivers will take advantage of a car versus pedestrian situation.
4. Selectively rule-bound - Pedestrians DO have right of way, but only under well defined situations, like designated pedestrian crossings (zebra crossings, signalised crossings). But Singaporeans are curiously selective over which rules they follow, and which they don't. Since this is the only situation where pedestrians have right of way, and they are also kiasu and tend to bully, they then take the opportunity to turn the tables by strolling across the road casually.
So don't expect right of way unless you are at a designated crossing. If it's any comfort, drivers behave the same way towards other drivers - impatient, kiasu and bullying behaviour within the bounds of the law.
In places where drivers stop for pedestrians to cross, there is obviously a different mindset at work. Pedestrians are treated as vulnerable, and the strong (the one in the car) should help the weak. There is less impatience, and "kiasu" is an alien concept. I found it refreshing when I was in those quiet suburban neighbourhoods in the US. Try this in Singapore and you will get a confused look.[笑天 (10-20 19:01, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]29楼
(引用 笑天:Why don't pedestrians have right of way in Singapore?Singapore does have a unique situation on the roads. Unlike, say, the US wh...)交警的回答Here is what I got from Traffic Police officer:
===================================
Thank you for your email
The two crossings shown in your photos is not a pedestrian crossing. As such, you would need to give way to motor vehicles before your cross. However, if a vehicle appear while you are crossing halfway, the vehicle should give way to you.
I hope that the above clarifies. Thank you.
===================================
So, this means in Singapore, vehicles have right-of-way over pedestrians, unless pedestrian crossing. This is surprising, and very dangerous basic expectation. But it explains why cars trying to squeeze in on my way when I walk or when I run.
More vulnerable has right of way on the road is basic rule in other countries. Pedestrians has right over bicycles. Bicycles over cars... In Singapore, it is opposite. Car has right of way over pedestrian. Everybody, please be careful.[笑天 (10-20 19:09, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]30楼
(引用 笑天:交警的回答Here is what I got from Traffic Police officer:
===================================
Thank you for your email
The two c...)所以交警的回答是“如果行人已经开始穿越马路了，车就得让人先过”？
我过那个小路口的时候，那辆车从远处开过来，根本没开左转向灯，所以我认为他是直行，没打算转弯。[HX3000 (10-21 13:08, Long long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]31楼
(引用 笑天:这个是解释啥是人行横道吧indicated as such by traffic signs, signals 没有人行横道也没有交通标志怎么办？再查一下 不过需要解释一下,...)编继续编 [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [功夫熊猫 (10-21 15:01, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]32楼
(引用 HX3000:所以交警的回答是“如果行人已经开始穿越马路了，车就得让人先过”？ 我过那个小路口的时候，那辆车从远处开过来，根本没开左转向灯，所�...)楼主不如公布一下是哪个路口大家可看google街景 评论 [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [功夫熊猫 (10-21 15:01, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]33楼