差点酿成大祸
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 本帖共有 132 楼,当前显示第 117 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:fqfp (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:4006) 发表:2022-02-19 01:08:04  117楼 
直行超速事故起点15% 但是这是起点而已。法官会视严重性加量 The appellant submitted that the MAG recommends that he should bear only 25% liability based on the following reasoning. Scenario 7(b) in the MAG suggests that the driver of the straight-moving vehicle in the Discretionary Right Turn Scenario should bear 15% liability. The MAG further recommends that if the driver having the right of way exceeds the speed limit, his liability should be increased by 10%. On this basis, the appellant argued that he should bear 25% liability at most. However, the MAG also recommends that if the other vehicle has crossed the junction substantially, the liability of the driver having the right of way should be increased by 5% to 10% as he would have had greater opportunity to avoid the collision The video footages showed that the second respondent had almost crossed at least the path of the Nissan at the junction when the collision occurred. If the appellant had not been charging into the junction at a dangerous speed, (more...)
加来加去,也就只能加到35%
这就是路权的作用,否则后果不堪设想。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 132 楼,当前显示第 117 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码