可以洗洗睡了
搞半天某人沾沾自喜的结果是完全错的,还说什么直行车只是超速被罚,没有其他责任,那不是断章取义,那是纯扯淡,
正式过程和结果在这里,非常详细,直行车没有超速那么多,是72到84,他没有减速,但不是故意,而是只看到了第一辆右转的车,没看到跟着的taxi,最终被判了35%责任。这个判罚我认为是有根有据。而绝不是什么路权最大说。
https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2021_SGCA_93
We therefore dismissed this appeal. This case certainly does not establish a precedent that the relative liability of straight-moving vehicles with the right of way against turning vehicles has now been raised to 35% without qualification. The appellant’s liability was assessed to be higher than most of the cases he cited simply because that degree of contributory negligence was justified on the facts.
以后跟fqfp辩得先做基本查证,否则连起点都是被误导的
正式过程和结果在这里,非常详细,直行车没有超速那么多,是72到84,他没有减速,但不是故意,而是只看到了第一辆右转的车,没看到跟着的taxi,最终被判了35%责任。这个判罚我认为是有根有据。而绝不是什么路权最大说。
https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2021_SGCA_93
We therefore dismissed this appeal. This case certainly does not establish a precedent that the relative liability of straight-moving vehicles with the right of way against turning vehicles has now been raised to 35% without qualification. The appellant’s liability was assessed to be higher than most of the cases he cited simply because that degree of contributory negligence was justified on the facts.
以后跟fqfp辩得先做基本查证,否则连起点都是被误导的
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]