越扯越离谱了 据我所知 这件事件之后 这两个人都被ERA除名了
好像每次一说起来 大家都会把这件事做为典型来说
之前已经说过了 老鼠屎各个行业都有 法庭上欺诈这种事件天天都有开审
每次都拿这个case说事 好像有点乏味
职位高低也并不代表人品高低 或许阿扁的例子可以再拿来用一次...:)
法官的话是很清楚:
act in the interests of the person who hired him...
who can help to explain the meaning of "hire"
在这个事件中,因为那个agent是卖方的exclusive agent, 所以卖方 "hire" this agent
所有这个agent必当维护卖方的权益 所以他的所作所为的确犯了法
至于这段
"希望所有的agent能够明白 这个和其他行业一样是这个社会的基础来着 就是叫做信托责任
即使没有书面上甚至口头上的约定,但是一个社会的公认的标准是在那里的
Conniesisu你说你去带buyer看房子,他和你没有obligation,这是不对的!!
更不能成为你可以让自己的利益超越buyer利益的理由!
否则这个社会就没有一个公平公正的规则了 "
我的解释只是为了让大家清楚 为什么大部分的agent会这么做 并没有说我就是那样做的人
这是要澄清的一点 (事实上, 我自己现在也只是纸上谈兵,还没正式上岗 (more...)
ERA的chairman和SVP都说没做错,而且他们和公司里的其他中介都做过同样的事情
Justice Choo rejected the testimony of ERA's top brass - president Jack Chua and senior vice-president Marcus Chu - that the two men had done nothing wrong.
The judge said it was clear why they thought so - Mr Chu admitted in court that he and others in the company, as well as agents in other companies, had done the same thing.
Justice Choo also rejected arguments by ERA that it was not liable for the actions of its agents, who are 'independent contractors'.
The option form had ERA's logo printed on it; the commission agreement was between Madam Wong and ERA; and the newspaper advertisements sought to persuade the public that they would have the backing of the company and its network by engaging an ERA agent.
It was also ERA - not Mr Ang - which took the couple to the Small Claims Tribunal when they refused to pay the commission on the sale.
The judge said it was clear why they thought so - Mr Chu admitted in court that he and others in the company, as well as agents in other companies, had done the same thing.
Justice Choo also rejected arguments by ERA that it was not liable for the actions of its agents, who are 'independent contractors'.
The option form had ERA's logo printed on it; the commission agreement was between Madam Wong and ERA; and the newspaper advertisements sought to persuade the public that they would have the backing of the company and its network by engaging an ERA agent.
It was also ERA - not Mr Ang - which took the couple to the Small Claims Tribunal when they refused to pay the commission on the sale.