华新 - 现在很多网民在呼吁他辞职了有些军队出来的老板不太会说话办事

现在很多网民在呼吁他辞职了有些军队出来的老板不太会说话办事

作者：BenXia (等级：3 - 略知一二，发帖：386) 发表：2021-05-10 08:24:29　楼主　关注此帖

替罪羊已经浮出水面这哥们还不引咎辞职？ SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung's 'umbrage' reaction 'unfortunate': K Shanmugam Sat, 8 May 2021, 5:51 pm SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung at a press conference on 6 May 2021 announcing SPH Media's restructuring. (SCREENCAP: Weixiang Lim/Facebook via The Straits Times/YouTube) SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung at a press conference on 6 May 2021 announcing SPH Media's restructuring. (SCREENCAP: Weixiang Lim/Facebook via The Straits Times/YouTube) SINGAPORE – The "take umbrage" reaction of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) chief executive officer Ng Yat Chung when SPH's editorial integrity was questioned recently at a press conference it called for was "very unfortunate", said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam. Speaking on the sidelines of a community event on Saturday (8 May), Shanmugam said to local media that "Mr Ng’s reaction and the way he answered the question... was very unfortunate," according to a report by Today. "His outburst can be described in stronger terms. But I want to be careful a (more...)

现在很多网民在呼吁他辞职了有些军队出来的老板不太会说话办事

有点像当时选举时PAP推选出来的那个吉宝船厂的准议员
这个家伙侵犯了小股东这么多利益，还态度那么傲慢

免费提供房产买卖租贷款相关咨询，欢迎做朋友 WX: besthomeasia

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：BenXia (等级：3 - 略知一二，发帖：386) 发表：2021-05-10 08:26:46　 2楼

[登录后回复]

在安家东盟号的大作中提到：

大家都投反对票吧这个操作太笨蛋了

I would have thought that SPH should receive millions in hiving the media busine

Instead SPH has to pump in $80 million of cash and transfer a certain number of its shares and that of SPH REIT. In this scenerio SPH is paying to get rid of the media business. Why not just cease the media business and shut it down!!!. Whoever is interested in the media business should take it over and pay SPH.I cannot fathom why SPH has to hive it off and pay for this exercise.

Not only should the CEO resign over the management of SPH but the whole Board of Directors who has appointed him and installed him as the CEO.

It is time that the Board be called to account and take responsibility for the management of SPH.

It is also time that the authorities take a proactive and robust approach to impove the effectiveness of corporate governance of all listed companies including SPH.The board of directors should not be a club for friends, cass and school mates, relatives or to repay past favours.It is time to include a least a representative from the minority shareholders. At present, independent directors are SUPPOSSED to protect the interest of the minority shareholders but in reality do they?

Now that this debacle has surfaced it is only honorable although not gentlemanly for the CEO to resign. Whether or not the other board members would resign would much depend on his or her conscience in evaluating how he or she has contributed to this state of affairs of SPH.

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：BenXia (等级：3 - 略知一二，发帖：386) 发表：2021-05-10 08:45:25　 3楼

[登录后回复]

在医药法规的大作中提到：

冷静来想，也许是长期利好呢？就好比壮士断腕，一次性损益把哪年报中最大的亏损因子和不赚钱业务剔除以后就海阔天空任翱翔毕竟小股东持有的还是要赚钱的公司，而且未来公司不需要背负媒体所背负的“道德枷锁”，随便怎么“凿“ 都可以投票没有用的，既然无力反抗，不如试着接受甚至享受-趁机抄个底也好啊。股市上将讲感情，结果就是亏钱。声明:本人现在并不持有，也不打算在近期持有任何SPH的股票。就酱

房地产公司PB都很低这个二线甚至3线地产公司不sexy

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：BenXia (等级：3 - 略知一二，发帖：386) 发表：2021-05-10 09:07:55　 4楼

[登录后回复]

在医药法规的大作中提到：

设想另一种情况不讲剥离，而是拆分，按业务比例，拆为报业控股和产业控股（目前业务比例是大约50:50，股价也一半一半）小股东会怎么选，怎么反应呢? 看来它们应该先找我顾问一下，呵呵

不赞成这跟白天抢钱差不多

联合早报和海峡时报一点价值都没有么
卖起来也可以10来个亿吧
就这样拱手送人，还要给8千万启动花

欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表

作者：BenXia (等级：3 - 略知一二，发帖：386) 发表：2021-05-12 22:14:26　 5楼

[登录后回复]

在医药法规的大作中提到：