急需新币十万, 借期两个月,可以支付2000利息
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 狮城财经 | 本帖共有 58 楼,当前显示第 58 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:快快跑 (等级:6 - 驾轻就熟,发帖:2016) 发表:2017-01-21 01:07:51  58楼 
讨论新加坡法律我用英文了哦Disclaimer: I am NOT a criminal lawyer. You are NOT my client. This is NOT a legal advice. I do not assume any responsibility if you choose to rely on the following information. You should engage a criminal lawyer if you are serious about the answer to your query. I would frame the issue in the following manner: whether or not it is a offence for a person to procure or offer to procure a loan for a consideration which is more than the principal sum from the a non-specific person in public who presumably neither possesses a moneylender licence nor is an exempted moneylender? The Short answer is: Yes, it is an offence under Moneylenders Acts s 14 which is punishable under s 14(1A) read together with s 109 of the penal code. Summarised analysis: 1. it is presumed to be illegal for a person who is not your friend or your relative to lend you money with a interest (ss 1, 3 and 5 of the Moneylenders Act). 2. Although you may feel free argue that a person you get "acquainted" via the in (more...)
首先逻辑完整,点赞。但重点部分讨论不深
总之知道了关于借钱合法性有一个要注意的坑。一定要让借贷行为尽可能避免被定义为carrying on the business of money lending。总之业余的、适度的、合理的、私下的、不广告的、不经常的借贷收利息行为是合法的。在公开论坛上邀约借钱是否违法,应该是并不绝对。要知道借贷人法令本身主要针对的是持续经营的放贷行为。法官判断时会考虑到各种因素。

再说执法问题。新加坡法律定的刑事罪的外延向来是极广的,比如非经授权下载音乐或软件就可能触犯版权法,可判坐牢最长6个月。但新加坡警方在小经济类案件执法是倾向于把它们当民事案处理的。比如说以前对类似森林广场这类明显是诈骗的案件不作为。比如说近来似乎有些换钱类的诈骗也是告知受害人不受理。警方通常要到民愤极大的时候才开始有行动。所以指望警方积极普遍查处网上借钱的行为基本不可能。

声明:本人表达个人业余的观点看法,不鼓励任何违法或可能违法的行为。
彻底的享受者
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 58 楼,当前显示第 58 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码