经济好,机构撤退及其它看了这几天的帖子,大家都谈到经济还是不错的,大盘没有理由掉,可是股票是走在经济的前面的,股票是经济的leading indicator,看经济来判断走势对么?1987年的时候经济很正常呀,不是一样崩盘。。
前几天看到了过儿兄提到的新加坡股市大鳄,列出了几只基金的top holding.可是那几只基金,最大的不超过500MM,单一股票的holding也就是20MM,我印尼的客户一次进UOB就是100MM,这些基金怎么能算大鳄?
而且在prospectus里面有规定,基金手里的cash不可hold太多,就算他们liqiudate掉positions,过两天还是要买进?机构怎么撤退呢?
请高人指点..
different investor class
they are not directly comparable. individual investors typically do not have diversified portfolio... Instititutions typically have dozens of investment in the portfolios and they typically have % limit on one investment. the purpose is to diversify risk and reduce single stock risk, altermative goal is to achieve better risk-adjusted return... I thinkin this case the client unlikely to have 20 or 50 investment like UOB at same time, and he also likely use some leverage tools (quite common for short term trade).
In one sense, SG market is too thin for institutions to build very large positions (5% disclosure rule).
sg players are 大鳄 level, say 100MM to several billion. Those US/UK big names would be 巨鳄,with dozen billion size. And only a few individual investors can pair with these guys.. eg, Warrant Buffet has 10% in China Petro, prince of Saudi has 5% (or 10%) in one big bank.
welcome to crocodile world..
In one sense, SG market is too thin for institutions to build very large positions (5% disclosure rule).
sg players are 大鳄 level, say 100MM to several billion. Those US/UK big names would be 巨鳄,with dozen billion size. And only a few individual investors can pair with these guys.. eg, Warrant Buffet has 10% in China Petro, prince of Saudi has 5% (or 10%) in one big bank.
welcome to crocodile world..