老夫也觉得把 '将有机会' 改成 '可以' 比较公正。
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 2 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:桑原秀策 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:111) 发表:2010-05-13 16:25:21  楼主  关注此帖
Please explain also what is meant by '将有机会'?Does that mean that even if you do well in the competition, you may not rightfully represent Singapore? If that is the case, this means SIXGA can send anyone they like to represent. Then in this case, don't need give so long explaination about having wuzonghan to play for Asia. Just say because SIXGA is paying and SIXGA want wu to play. Every chess players will be LAn Lan. So save the bla bla bla.. If SIXGA is sincerely want to select players base on a fair system. Why can't let WuZongHan go through a selection round? Maybe SIXGA can consider let Wu play against 4th ranked player of 2010 national and winner represents? Atleast this is being fair to 4th ranked player. Its SIXGA choice. Want to play fair or want to play monopoly?
老夫也觉得把 '将有机会' 改成 '可以' 比较公正。
小吴代表老夫赞成。但仅限今年特别情况。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:桑原秀策 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:111) 发表:2010-05-20 20:31:00  2楼
“9+1”是一个完善的制度,还是一个愚蠢的制度?实行这个制度的好处在哪里?坏处在哪里?请棋友们深思,敢敢坦率发表自己的意见,不要因为为了“懂得做人”,不敢发表己见! 我现在要赶去探访女棋王张心环,今晚再回来和各位棋友谈论这个课题。
只要棋手凭良心下棋,不下假棋,任何制度都ok.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 2 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码