I think it's only fair to stick to the rules of the competition.
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 3 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:155HgFH88 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:16) 发表:2009-12-17 10:08:09  楼主  关注此帖
HOWEVER, FINAL DECISION IS STILL SIXGA PREROGATIVE & SHOULD BE HONORED.
I think it's only fair to stick to the rules of the competition.
The original rules have already stated that the top 8 players will qualify for the quarter-final and it should be honoured. Whether 卷心菜 turns up or not should not be used as a consideration to admit Chen Jing Ling to the quarter-final. This holds true even for international competitions. If a sportsman is absent from a match for whatever reason, it is considered a walkover and that no replacement is allowed.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:155HgFH88 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:16) 发表:2009-12-17 15:42:30  2楼
Yup, that's the movie where at the end,breaking the rules help save many lifes.
I certainly do not agree with breaking of rules for any reasons.
Rules maintain the integrity of a competition, analogous to how law ensures the security of a country. Moreover, this is a National competition and amending the rules midway through the competition will set a precedent case for future disputes. The proper procedure would be to write in to SIXGA about your concern about amending the rules (such as allowing replacement of players in the case of withdrawal) and implement it in future competitions.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:155HgFH88 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:16) 发表:2009-12-17 15:45:23  3楼
我认为这里有些偏见。我认为卷心菜在拼死拼活提象总愁人数的情况下然后无奈中国,淘汰了他对他很不公平。他这次打进了前8就是已经确保升级了这么可以把他这个机会送给小陈?我认为小胡第一轮没有出席已经确保了他的乙级水平了。我本人也跟他下过。虽然我赢了,但是从棋上可以看出这位年轻棋手的天分和斗志。至于小陈的事没有必要一直争论。他毕竟没打进前8。这个成绩上已经证明了。还有没那么容易说放就放的。如果想升级或认为这是不公平的。什么方面都会对某个棋手造成一些偏心一些“不公平” 。已经有很多亿级上来打甲组了多一个少一个也没什么区别。  
I agree with xiaobeidou
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 3 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码