Learning from the methods used in the last 5 years .......
11 + 0 method used in 2005.
9 + 0 method used in 2006.
in fact, 7 + 3 method was considered before 2007 National Open but 7 + 2 method was used instead in 2007 and again in 2008 ........
For 7 + 3 method, assume players A, B, C and D perform very well in the first 7 rounds as compared to players E, F, G and H.
After the first 7 rounds, the orders of ranking are A, B, C, D, E,F, G and H.
In Round 8, all players A, B, C and D perform badly and ended up players E, F, G and H move into semi-final and promoted to Grade B, i.e. Round 8 is the most critical round for all 8 players.
Personally, if we have times for 7 + 3 method, could we consider 9 + 1 method, if it is too late for National Open 2009, then how about next year ?
I understand it is not easy to design a system to take care of all factors, but since we have tried 11 + 0, 9 + 0, 7 + 2 methods so far, if it is not working well this year for 7 + 3 method, may be we should conisder the x + 1 (more...)
经赛务组澄清:今年B组的赛制有点特殊,难以给予一个适当的名称!
今年B组的赛制,有点类似单淘汰,但进入第8轮的前8名位棋手,都会下满三盘棋,以决出8位棋手的名次,不像以往的单淘汰赛,棋手下输一盘棋,就被淘汰。
至于碧山君担心前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,有机会击败排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,显示出这个制度有欠公允,这点我不能苟同。第一:前七轮赛事过后的排名,还不能真正显示个别棋手的实力;第二:由于个别的因素,前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,他们棋力并不逊于排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,第8轮开始的单淘汰制,就是让他们有一个翻身的机会,证明自己的实力。
至于碧山君担心前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,有机会击败排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,显示出这个制度有欠公允,这点我不能苟同。第一:前七轮赛事过后的排名,还不能真正显示个别棋手的实力;第二:由于个别的因素,前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,他们棋力并不逊于排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,第8轮开始的单淘汰制,就是让他们有一个翻身的机会,证明自己的实力。