Learning from the methods used in the last 5 years .......
11 + 0 method used in 2005.
9 + 0 method used in 2006.
in fact, 7 + 3 method was considered before 2007 National Open but 7 + 2 method was used instead in 2007 and again in 2008 ........
For 7 + 3 method, assume players A, B, C and D perform very well in the first 7 rounds as compared to players E, F, G and H.
After the first 7 rounds, the orders of ranking are A, B, C, D, E,F, G and H.
In Round 8, all players A, B, C and D perform badly and ended up players E, F, G and H move into semi-final and promoted to Grade B, i.e. Round 8 is the most critical round for all 8 players.
Personally, if we have times for 7 + 3 method, could we consider 9 + 1 method, if it is too late for National Open 2009, then how about next year ?
I understand it is not easy to design a system to take care of all factors, but since we have tried 11 + 0, 9 + 0, 7 + 2 methods so far, if it is not working well this year for 7 + 3 method, may be we should conisder the x + 1 (more...)
第八轮开始采用的是双败淘汰制!
B组七轮比赛之后,进入第八轮的八强赛,赛制是采用双败淘汰制,因此一个棋友们普遍认为棋艺好的棋手如果进入八强后下输两场,被淘汰出圈,只能说明自己的棋艺水平还未到家,不能埋怨棋赛的制度。我也相信,如果一个棋艺水平未到家的棋手,不会那么侥幸,一路杀到大决赛。
双败淘汰赛最后一次的采用是1976年,我当年就是在制度下受惠。那时有点幸运,两局慢棋下和没有加赛快棋决出胜负,而是以抽签决定。在比赛过程中,我两次两局慢棋下和,经由抽签进入胜方,最后才在半决赛以一胜一和战胜西马黄运兴荣获冠军宝座。
现在令我感到疑惑的是,如果是采用双败淘汰制,8位棋手下3轮好像是不足够的,不知道我的分析是否正确,希望棋友们能够帮忙纠正!
七轮以后,八位棋手进入八强
第8轮赛完: 胜方-4位棋手1胜;负方-4位选手1负
第9轮赛完: 胜方-2位棋手2胜,2位棋手1胜1负;负方-2位棋手1胜1负,2位棋手2负(淘汰)
第10轮赛完:胜方-1位棋手3胜(冠军),2位棋手2胜1负,1位棋手1胜2负(淘汰);负方-1位棋手2胜1负,1位棋手1胜2负(淘汰)
胜方还有2位2胜1负的棋手,负方还有1位2胜1负的棋手,三轮够吗?请棋友们帮我释疑!
双败淘汰赛最后一次的采用是1976年,我当年就是在制度下受惠。那时有点幸运,两局慢棋下和没有加赛快棋决出胜负,而是以抽签决定。在比赛过程中,我两次两局慢棋下和,经由抽签进入胜方,最后才在半决赛以一胜一和战胜西马黄运兴荣获冠军宝座。
现在令我感到疑惑的是,如果是采用双败淘汰制,8位棋手下3轮好像是不足够的,不知道我的分析是否正确,希望棋友们能够帮忙纠正!
七轮以后,八位棋手进入八强
第8轮赛完: 胜方-4位棋手1胜;负方-4位选手1负
第9轮赛完: 胜方-2位棋手2胜,2位棋手1胜1负;负方-2位棋手1胜1负,2位棋手2负(淘汰)
第10轮赛完:胜方-1位棋手3胜(冠军),2位棋手2胜1负,1位棋手1胜2负(淘汰);负方-1位棋手2胜1负,1位棋手1胜2负(淘汰)
胜方还有2位2胜1负的棋手,负方还有1位2胜1负的棋手,三轮够吗?请棋友们帮我释疑!