add ons
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 6 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-02 17:05:01  楼主  关注此帖评分:
I think we should respect the 2008 national competition result as well as....the top 4 ranked players in that competition. This year national open had produced the best 4 players in Singapore and they should represent Singapore based on that result. To ask players to step down and make way for supposedly better player is selfish and shown disregard for the national open result. And it is not guaranteed that the other so called "better players" can do better that the current 4. I understand that the current batch of national players had been trying their best to prepare for the upcoming competition. I believe we should give them the chance to represent Singapore and not try to apply pressure on them to quit. Afterall, base on this year National Open result, they are the best 4 players that we have this year.
add ons
i think for the following sentence,
<Based on this year's national open result, they are the 4 best player that we have for this year>

its better to add a few more words after 4 best players to make the sentence more complete,
<Based on this year's national open result, they are the 4 best players [out of all those participants] we have for this year>.

best 4 in national open doesnt mean best 4 in Singapore as not all players have participated..

hmm...
棋很水. 在我手下的马是牛,炮是包, 车是三轮车,兵是饼,帅是衰。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-02 23:54:05  2楼
UnnecessaryWhen piggy888 wrote the post, we could all understand he's talking about this year score not trying to underestimate all players in Singapore. Therefore I think the add-ons are quite unnecessary. Otherwise if people continue and continue to add on, the sentence eventually becomes something like this and even worse: . I guess you didn't play the tournament this year and missed a lot of fun. :P (more...)
misunderstandings
add ons may be unnecessary as they are just words. The main part the meaning in the addons. Guess you intepreted it as just addition of nouns and adjectives and made fun of it.

In piggy's post he said that the top 4 in national open deserves to represent sg as they are the best 4 in SG.

I merely commented that in other words, the statement is doubtful.

i think that best 4 in national open means that they are the best 4 out of people who participated, however there may be people thinking that the results are unreliable due to tournament system.

However piggy did mention that the so called 'better players' are not guaranteed better than top 4 in national open.

That is why the more they are currently still not deemed the best 4 in SG.

Best 4 is best 4, its a matter of determining them out.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-03 11:29:30  3楼
senselesswhat jidu was trying to say is that the best 4 should be given the benefit of doubt and not by saying that the best 4 in the competition is the best 4 out of those that participated the reason is because of piggy's previous post of trying to ENCOURAGE and trying to tell people to suppport the national players. Here you are telling people that they are top 4 "only for that year" and only for "those that participated" can u tell me why this statement is necessasary? Do you have a better way of selecting the top 4? Maybe u wanna organise another national competition. All systems are flawed some have more some have less. Which is the best is still hard to say. This current system might be to a disadvantage to some stronger players but it has also a very good way of training the players mental and also helping players adjust to different systems more importantly it gives different players more opportunity to represent Singapore. I think people like ruizhan deserve some credit instead people are asking pe (more...)
facts
Sorry you guys may think its unnecessary but i still think that whatever i have posted are still facts necessary to balance piggy's post out. Please recall that piggy said that top 4 in national open means best 4 in sg, thats why i just said what i posted to correct that statement.

I do not have a better way to select the best 4 players that is why i ended my post that way.

Who can guarantee someone can play very well? nobody can do that, but at least we can do our best to INCREASE the chance of winning. Everyone would want the best for our country.

And if you want to say this i can also say who can guarantee kids under 10 yrs old cannot play well in competition??

Now the thing is how to choose best 4 which is a tough problem but i agree with what bls said that in his post <I agree with Piggy and we should not change player last minute.>
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-03 17:30:43  4楼
Yellow card to 水棋!!!
aww why?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-03 17:38:43  5楼
what makes u think that it will increase our chances?Specificed in my previous post. Being 2 time Singapore champion at that time who would expect the results hansoon produced? If a 2 time singapore champion can produce these sort of results, who can u expect to produce results? of course it's not his fault i believe it's about his form being affected by other factors. What makes you think that sending a better player would produce better results? Of course sending a better player would play a part but thats not the most crucial part. Speaking from past experience, Playing in an international competition wouldn't really matter much if your standard is more or less there you just need to have a weapon and must not be too weak in the other parts of your game and form is the key to sucess. i also agree with jidu that he said that they dared to play so those that did not play for whatsoever reason should not be taken into consideration thats why i say given the benefit of doubt. And on the trophy it does say QU (more...)
good. hope you are able to convince the organisers who are in this forum.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:水棋 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:55) 发表:2008-09-03 17:40:31  6楼
Yellow card to 水棋!!!
who is this referee? official referee in hua sing ma?
do i get something deducted when i am issued yellow card?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 6 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码