全国B组总结
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 82 楼,当前显示第 31 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:火云邪神 (等级:4 - 马马虎虎,发帖:373) 发表:2007-06-23 12:45:15  31楼 
It is good to have one common system for all ages, we study .... the grading system of 汕头棋院 (11 grades for the youth) too, have a look at Hong Kong System (more than 20 grades in total). May be it is easier for Bishan to try out our 12-grade system for all age groups within the club. Furthermore, we are not having a separate system if you look at the condition in details, e.g. Grade 1 = Grade A of SIXGA from SIXGA Group A competiton each year Grade 2 = Grade B of SIXGA from SIXGA Group B competiton each year Grade 3 = Positons 5 to 8 of SIXGA Group B competiton each year Grade 4 = Positions 9 to 12 of SIXGA Group B competiton each year other grades just to take care of various age groups competition of Char Yong Cup organised by SIXGA in March each year.
Complimentary system
Is this system proposed to SIXGA? The Grade 3 onwards is an interesting idea. The system should blend in with the current SXIGA rating rather than a new entity of its own.

If not, will be wierd if each club has its own system. (E.g. Bishan Grade 1 vs Kampong Glam Grade 1, rather than Bishan JiaJi vs Kampong Glam JiaJi)

What do you all think?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 82 楼,当前显示第 31 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码