世卫泄露的也是吉利德自己给的
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 36 楼,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  2    末页>>
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 08:03:42  楼主  关注此帖
对啊,有没有效时间会说明一切这是Gilead自己发布的数据,之前好几个第三方trial也给出类似结果,当然不包括泄漏世卫数据的那家,后续更详细的数据马上会出来,FDA已经开始在程序上把瑞德西韦列为治疗新冠的专用药了。 我们应该为有有效药物的出现感到高兴,可是有些人看不得这些。幸好我们是在小坡,FDA批准后这边应该很快也会有了。 (more...)
世卫泄露的也是吉利德自己给的
只是泄得早了点。套路啊
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 09:40:50  2楼
【其它话题】瑞德西韦数据出来了简单概括下来就是对50%病患有效,其中一半两周内出院,今晚美股要大涨了。 某国最先爆发疫情,最先拿到药,最先展开盲测,最后却因病人不够宣告此药无效,真的是一声叹息。  该帖荣获当日十大第1,奖励楼主25分以及37华新币,时间:2020-04-30 22:00:01。 (more...)
数据说话,各自解读, 形势需要

In that 397-patient trial, Gilead said 62% of patients treated early with remdesivir were discharged from the hospital, compared with 49% of patients who were treated later in the course of the infection. 


The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, said partial results from its 1,063-patient trial show that hospitalized COVID-19 patients given remdesivir recovered in 11 days, compared to 15 days for patients given a placebo. 


The study showed a trend toward better survival for remdesivir - 8% of patients given the drug died compared with 11.6% in the placebo group - but the difference was not statistically significant so may not be due to Gilead’s drug.

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 09:47:43  3楼
数据说话,各自解读, 形势需要In that 397-patient trial, Gilead said 62% of patients treated early with remdesivir were discharged from the hospital, compared with 49% of patients who were treated later in the course of the infection.  The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, said partial results from its 1,063-patient trial show that hospitalized COVID-19 patients given remdesivir recovered in 11 days, compared to 15 days for patients given a placebo.  The study showed a trend toward better survival for remdesivir - 8% of patients given the drug died compared with 11.6% in the placebo group - but the difference was not statistically significant so may not be due to Gilead’s drug. (more...)
Gilead server down
原文找不到
新闻报告里前几次报告的死亡率,副作用都没提到
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 09:50:16  4楼
Gilead server down原文找不到 新闻报告里前几次报告的死亡率,副作用都没提到
订单爆棚?


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 10:31:00  5楼
【其它话题】瑞德西韦数据出来了简单概括下来就是对50%病患有效,其中一半两周内出院,今晚美股要大涨了。 某国最先爆发疫情,最先拿到药,最先展开盲测,最后却因病人不够宣告此药无效,真的是一声叹息。  该帖荣获当日十大第1,奖励楼主25分以及37华新币,时间:2020-04-30 22:00:01。 (more...)
来了,结果自己看
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 10:32:53  6楼
来了,结果自己看http://investors.gilead.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gilead-announces-results-phase-3-trial-investigational-antiviral http://investors.gilead.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gilead-sciences-statement-positive-data-emerging-national
显然不符合常规的报告
对照组呢?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 10:51:16  7楼
显然不符合常规的报告对照组呢?
4月23号的报告

https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/23/data-on-gileads-remdesivir-released-by-accident-show-no-benefit-for-coronavirus-patients/ 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/23/gilead-says-draft-of-coronavirus-treatment-results-contain-inappropriate-characterization-and-are-inconclusive.html

 

According to the summary of the China study, remdesivir was “not associated with a difference in time to clinical improvement” compared to a standard of care control. After one month, it appeared 13.9% of the remdesivir patients had died compared to 12.8% of patients in the control arm. The difference was not statistically significant.

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:03:38  8楼
我猜测现在的重症患者没几个敢参加双盲的如果被分到安慰剂那组,死亡率还是挺高的
我相信数据是真实的
换了个积极的说法而已
但是3期报告这样不是科学报告可以接受的
new release 没问题,随便怎么解释。
Gilead的三期是双盲设计的
https://www.businessinsider.sg/coronavirus-treatment-data-on-gilead-remdesivir-who-2020-4?r=US&IR=T
The trial ended up including 237 participants, with 158 receiving remdesivir and 79 receiving a placebo. It was designed to enroll 453 people.
The summary said that about 14% of those taking remdesivir had died after a month, compared with about 13% of those in the placebo group,
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:07:10  9楼
你弄错了,不是这个试验一共三个试验发布。gilead发布的是5天和10天的对比,没有显著差别,就是用10天的药是浪费的,只要用5天的药就够了,可以节省些药用来治更多的人。 还有一个证明有效的大规模双盲对比试验是这个 https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/nih-clinical-trial-shows-remdesivir-accelerates-recovery-advanced-covid-19 最后,那个由于入组人数不足提前终止的中日友好医院的双盲对比验,得出的结论,在此次临床试验中,瑞德西韦对重症新冠肺炎患者临床症状没有明显改善效果,其有效性仍有待研究。也就是之前WHO提前泄露的那个。 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext 最后说一下,好像世界上不存在针对病毒的特效药,不需要反复重复强调“不是特效”,因为这本来就是预期中的。大规模双盲对比试验证明死亡率没有改善,但可以减少30%的住院时间,可以节省很多床位。但是,大部分国家通过隔离和扩容,床位不足问题目前已经不严重了。了胜于无吧。
读了一下,这个就是最新
的 5-10天比较
其他的完全没有涉及
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:21:06  10楼
另外两个也是最新的April 29, 2020认真读一读吧
自己和自己比,5天和10天比
按我的理解,只能(要)用5天, 10天反而更差, 对不对呢?

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:24:24  11楼
另外两个也是最新的April 29, 2020认真读一读吧
读吧
看这个药到底怎么样?
有效还是”需要“?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:25:41  12楼
读吧看这个药到底怎么样? 有效还是”需要“?
火了,全文再此

Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19

April 29, 2020 at 8:35 AM EDT

-- Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of Remdesivir --

FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 29, 2020--Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) today announced topline results from the open-label, Phase 3 SIMPLE trial evaluating 5-day and 10-day dosing durations of the investigational antiviral remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. The study demonstrated that patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatment group. Gilead plans to submit the full data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in the coming weeks.

“Unlike traditional drug development, we are attempting to evaluate an investigational agent alongside an evolving global pandemic. Multiple concurrent studies are helping inform whether remdesivir is a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19 and how to best utilize the drug,” said Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “These study results complement data from the placebo-controlled study of remdesivir conducted by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and help to determine the optimal duration of treatment with remdesivir. The study demonstrates the potential for some patients to be treated with a 5-day regimen, which could significantly expand the number of patients who could be treated with our current supply of remdesivir. This is particularly important in the setting of a pandemic, to help hospitals and healthcare workers treat more patients in urgent need of care.”

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. This study sought to determine whether a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir would achieve similar efficacy results as the 10-day treatment regimen used in multiple ongoing studies of remdesivir. Secondary objectives included rates of adverse events and additional measures of clinical response in both treatment groups. Patients were required to have evidence of pneumonia and reduced oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study entry. Clinical improvement was defined as an improvement of two or more points from baseline on a predefined seven-point scale, ranging from hospital discharge to increasing levels of oxygen support to death. Patients achieved clinical recovery if they no longer required oxygen support and medical care or were discharged from the hospital.

In this study, the time to clinical improvement for 50 percent of patients was 10 days in the 5-day treatment group and 11 days in the 10-day treatment group. More than half of patients in both treatment groups were discharged from the hospital by Day 14 (5-day: 60.0%, n=120/200 vs.10-day: 52.3% n=103/197; p=0.14). At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the 5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

Clinical outcomes varied by geography. Outside of Italy, the overall mortality rate at Day 14 was 7 percent (n=23/320) across both treatment groups, with 64 percent (n=205/320) of patients experiencing clinical improvement at Day 14 and 61 percent (n=196/320) of patients discharged from the hospital.

Impact of Earlier Treatment

In an exploratory analysis, patients in the study who received remdesivir within 10 days of symptom onset had improved outcomes compared with those treated after more than 10 days of symptoms. Pooling data across treatment arms, by Day 14, 62 percent of patients treated early were able to be discharged from the hospital, compared with 49 percent of patients who were treated late.

“These data are encouraging as they indicate that patients who received a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir experienced similar clinical improvement as patients who received a 10-day treatment course,” said Aruna Subramanian, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Chief, Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, and one of the lead investigators of the study. “While additional data are still needed, these results help to bring a clearer understanding of how treatment with remdesivir may be optimized, if proven safe and effective.”

Remdesivir was generally well-tolerated in both the 5-day and 10-day treatment groups. The most common adverse events occurring in more than 10 percent of patients in either group were nausea (5-day: 10.0%, n=20/200 vs. 10-day: 8.6%, n=17/197) and acute respiratory failure (5-day: 6.0%, n=12/200 vs. 10-day: 10.7%, n= 21/197). Grade 3 or higher liver enzyme (ALT) elevations occurred in 7.3 percent (n=28/385) of patients, with 3.0 percent (n=12/397) of patients discontinuing remdesivir treatment due to elevated liver tests.

Key efficacy and safety results from the study are included in the table below.

 

5-Day RDV

10-Day RDV

Baseline adjusted

n=200

n=197

p-value1

Clinical Efficacy Outcomes at Day 14

≥ 2-point improvement in ordinal scale

129 (65)

107 (54)

0.16

Clinical recovery

129 (65)

106 (54)

0.17

Discharge

120 (60)

103 (52)

0.44

Death

16 (8)

21 (11)

0.70

Safety

Any adverse event (AE)

141 (71)

145 (74)

0.86

Grade ≥3 study drug-related AE

8 (4)

10 (5)

0.65

Study drug-related serious adverse event (SAE)

3 (2)

4 (2)

0.73

AE leading to discontinuation

9 (5)

20 (10)

0.07

1Adjusted for baseline clinical status

About the SIMPLE Trials

Gilead initiated two randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase 3 clinical trials for remdesivir, the SIMPLE studies, in countries with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection.

The first SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and 10-day dosing regimens of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of COVID-19. The initial phase of the study randomized 397 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive remdesivir 200 mg on the first day, followed by remdesivir 100 mg each day until day 5 or 10, administered intravenously, in addition to standard of care. An expansion phase of the study was recently added and will enroll an additional 5,600 patients, including patients on mechanical ventilation. The study is being conducted at 180 trial sites around the world, including sites in the United States, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

A second SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and 10-day dosing durations of remdesivir administered intravenously in patients with moderate manifestations of COVID-19, compared with standard of care. The results from the first 600 patients of this study are expected at the end of May.

About Remdesivir

Remdesivir is an investigational nucleotide analog with broad-spectrum antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo in animal models against multiple emerging viral pathogens, including Ebola, Marburg, MERS and SARS. In vitro testing conducted by Gilead has demonstrated that remdesivir is active against the virus that causes COVID-19. The safety and efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 are being evaluated in multiple ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials.

About Gilead Sciences

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a research-based biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops and commercializes innovative medicines in areas of unmet medical need. The company strives to transform and simplify care for people with life-threatening illnesses around the world. Gilead has operations in more than 35 countries worldwide, with headquarters in Foster City, California.

For more information on Gilead’s response to the coronavirus outbreak please visit the company’s dedicated page: https://www.gilead.com/purpose/advancing-global-health/covid-19.

Forward-Looking Statement

This press release includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Remdesivir is an investigational agent that has not been licensed or approved anywhere globally, and it has not been demonstrated to be safe or effective for any use, including for the treatment of COVID-19. There is the possibility of unfavorable results from ongoing and additional clinical trials involving remdesivir and the possibility that Gilead and other parties may be unable to complete one or more of such trials in the currently anticipated timelines or at all. Further, it is possible that Gilead may make a strategic decision to discontinue development of remdesivir or that FDA and other regulatory agencies may not approve remdesivir, and any marketing approvals, if granted, may have significant limitations on its use. As a result, remdesivir may never be successfully commercialized. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described in detail in Gilead’s periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including current reports on Form 8-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to Gilead, and Gilead assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:27:03  13楼
火了,全文再此Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19 April 29, 2020 at 8:35 AM EDT PDF Version -- Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of Remdesivir -- FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 29, 2020--Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) today announced topline results from the open-label, Phase 3 SIMPLE trial evaluating 5-day and 10-day dosing durations of the investigational antiviral remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. The study demonstrated that patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatme (more...)
另一篇全文

Gilead Sciences Statement on Positive Data Emerging From National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Study of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir for COVID-19

April 29, 2020 at 8:30 AM EDT

FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 29, 2020--Gilead Sciences. Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) is aware of positive data emerging from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) study of the investigational antiviral remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. We understand that the trial has met its primary endpoint and that NIAID will provide detailed information at an upcoming briefing.

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Gilead will share additional remdesivir data from the company’s open-label Phase 3 SIMPLE trial in patients with severe COVID-19 disease shortly. This study will provide information on whether a shorter, 5-day duration of therapy may have similar efficacy and safety as the 10-day treatment course evaluated in the NIAID trial and other ongoing trials. Gilead expects data at the end of May from the second SIMPLE study evaluating the 5- and 10-day dosing durations of remdesivir in patients with moderate COVID-19 disease.

Gilead will continue to discuss with regulatory authorities the growing data set regarding remdesivir as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

About Remdesivir

Remdesivir is an investigational nucleotide analog with broad-spectrum antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo in animal models against multiple emerging viral pathogens, including Ebola, Marburg, MERS and SARS. In vitro testing conducted by Gilead has demonstrated that remdesivir is active against the virus that causes COVID-19. The safety and efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 are being evaluated in multiple ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials.

About Gilead Sciences

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a research-based biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops and commercializes innovative medicines in areas of unmet medical need. The company strives to transform and simplify care for people with life-threatening illnesses around the world. Gilead has operations in more than 35 countries worldwide, with headquarters in Foster City, California.

Forward-Looking Statement

This statement includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Remdesivir is an investigational drug that has not been approved by any regulatory authority, and it has not been demonstrated to be safe or effective for any use, including for the treatment of COVID-19. There is the possibility of unfavorable results from ongoing and additional clinical trials involving remdesivir and the possibility that Gilead may be unable to complete one or more of such trials in the currently anticipated timelines or at all. Further, it is possible that Gilead may make a strategic decision to discontinue development of remdesivir or that FDA and other regulatory authorities may not approve remdesivir, and any marketing approvals, if granted, may have significant limitations on its use. As a result, remdesivir may never be successfully commercialized. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described in detail in Gilead’s periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including current reports on Form 8-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to Gilead, and Gilead assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:33:09  14楼
另一篇全文Gilead Sciences Statement on Positive Data Emerging From National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Study of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir for COVID-19 April 29, 2020 at 8:30 AM EDT PDF Version FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 29, 2020--Gilead Sciences. Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) is aware of positive data emerging from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) study of the investigational antiviral remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. We understand that the trial has met its primary endpoint and that NIAID will provide detailed information at an upcoming briefing. Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Gilead will share additional remdesivir data from the company’s open-label Phase 3 SIMPLE trial in patients with severe (more...)
23号的报告(leaked)- 科学态度?

https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/23/data-on-gileads-remdesivir-released-by-accident-show-no-benefit-for-coronavirus-patients/

New data on Gilead’s remdesivir, released by accident, show no benefit for coronavirus patients. Company still sees reason for hope



欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:42:43  15楼
各个高人都是牛人说的头头是道,也不知道有没有道理。 作为投资者,我只相信资本市场。你们慢慢聊,我买我的股票就对了。
股票和科学态度是两回事
股票更接近于政治 - 呵呵呵

钱要赚,科学态度也要严谨 - 哈哈哈哈
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 11:50:45  16楼
只能说五天non inferior 或者10天 non superior
这也是正面的表述,领导都喜欢这样的
而实际结果就是 5天比10天更好
准确的表达就是 -这个药用5天就好了, 不需要用10天, 如果用5天还治不好,就安天命吧
是不是这样?
科学道理和依据呢?
从什么时候开始给药,然后算5天, 确诊? 或者有明确症状? 比如SPO2<90(95%)....
都没有提到
这个只是新闻稿, 不是研究报告, 继续等!
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 12:17:58  17楼
【其它话题】瑞德西韦数据出来了简单概括下来就是对50%病患有效,其中一半两周内出院,今晚美股要大涨了。 某国最先爆发疫情,最先拿到药,最先展开盲测,最后却因病人不够宣告此药无效,真的是一声叹息。  该帖荣获当日十大第1,奖励楼主25分以及37华新币,时间:2020-04-30 22:00:01。 (more...)
Gilead成功了 -原来真的是政治
完全是为了平衡这篇文章-人家发在柳叶刀《the Lancet》
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 12:19:54  18楼
Gilead成功了 -原来真的是政治完全是为了平衡这篇文章-人家发在柳叶刀《the Lancet》 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext
PDF 这里
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 12:21:14  19楼
PDF 这里https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931022-9
不管结果如何
报告应该像这样才对
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:笑天 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:9295) 发表:2020-04-30 12:24:18  20楼
不管结果如何报告应该像这样才对
主要结果


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 36 篇文章,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  2  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码