对新加坡的医疗水平再一次无语了
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 180 楼,当前显示第 77 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:lgland (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:2206) 发表:2018-08-11 18:50:15  77楼 
我认真的查了一下uptodate就肾石检测是这么说的: “Ultrasound is less sensitive and demonstrates greater diagnostic variability than CT of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast for the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis. Ultrasound detects 24 to 57 percent of stones seen with CT [76,77]. Consequently, a CT is sometimes performed after a negative ultrasound to evaluate for a stone if the index of clinical suspicion remains high. Ultrasound is less accurate than CT at measuring stone size and defining ureteral location. Thus, a positive ultrasound often leads to a follow-up CT to enable treatment planning. Ultrasound has been compared with standard-dose abdominopelvic CT for diagnostic performance and cumulative population-level radiation dose. A multicenter trial of 2759 emergency department patients clinically suspected to have nephrolithiasis were randomly assigned to initial imaging with a standard-dose, noncontrast CT, ultrasound performed by a radiologist, or ultrasound performed at the bedside by an emergency (more...)
你说的可能是正确的,但毫无意义
举个例子,B超对于有气脏器,是不适合的,但是北大一个B超专家,经过长期实践,摸索了一套B超胃癌早期诊断方法。并且推广到其他医院,成为胃镜检查的辅助方法。这就是水平了,你不服不行。
同样的仪器,不同的结果。中国很多医生都有自己的独门方法,仪器能发挥最大的功效,而不是唯仪器定夺。
李玮玲曾经公开批评新加坡某些医生只知道仪器,没有医生的判断,就是这个意思
Put your OWN COOL signature here!
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 180 楼,当前显示第 77 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码