拿银牌的比拿铜牌的更为不满ztIs It Better to Win Bronze Than Silver?
Imagine that for most of your life, you have been preparing for the Olympics. You are intensely competitive, and you badly want to win. But you know that in your event, only one person can win Olympic gold, and that only three can bring home a medal. Silver is better than bronze, of course; it’s great to be third in the world, but it’s even better to be second.
Or is it?
Research suggests that in the Olympics, those who finish third are likely to be a lot happier than those who finish second. The reason is that much of our thinking is based on counterfactuals. We like to ask: What else could have happened?
If you finish second, you tend to think that with a little good luck, or maybe a bit of extra effort or skill, you might have gotten the prize of a lifetime: Olympic gold. But if you finish third, you tend to think that with a little bad luck, or without that extra effort or skill, you wouldn’t have gotten the prize of a lifetime: a (more...)
quite true.
the same reason, you would not compare with those who are very far away from your life, but you'd like to compare with your friends nearby.
sometimes, i think if time will gradually close the gap, and sometimes, you know, the chance still play a significant role.
if silver winner is very close to the gold medalist, he would feel bad, if the silver medalist is far away from the gold, but just a bit fast or better than the bronze, he/she might feel good.
sometimes, i think if time will gradually close the gap, and sometimes, you know, the chance still play a significant role.
if silver winner is very close to the gold medalist, he would feel bad, if the silver medalist is far away from the gold, but just a bit fast or better than the bronze, he/she might feel good.