I only reply your postI only reply your post, not the others, cause personally really I don’t mean to offence you, just wanna share my true feeling abou that issue. And you has been a adorable girl in this BBS all the time, I never mean offence you, again.
And, seems the rest are quite into the debat, no the issue itself we are talking about. So I only wanna rely your post.
First of all, whether there is ghost or not, is really a serious topic to me, that why I did that kind of research.
I didn’t say who is wrong who is right (read my post carefully), I just say no one should make a assertion without any research.
You experience this kind of thing from a few years ago, and you didn’t go and find out the reason, but think might because of ghost…. Maybe we are totally difference person, I really take @ghost@ staff seriously, maybe because I am a typical SM3…, or maybe I am a very easily scared person.
And I think if you are a teacher, you should have self alerting even in your casual talk.
Caus (more...)
it, here l refer to the afore-entry, is insightful nevertheless with little
sense.
don't you, and I, as "a [sic] adult" believe open inquiry without any preoccupation prejudice?
is the action of ghost not an intelligible explanation to the phenomenon aforementioned?
is sans-supernatural an essential characteristic of a BBS whose users are mainly educated (by using this word I must say sorry to the one who invent this verb with his/her best innocent conscience.) adults?
a clear mind certainly gives negation to all the three questions.
don't you, and I, as "a [sic] adult" believe open inquiry without any preoccupation prejudice?
is the action of ghost not an intelligible explanation to the phenomenon aforementioned?
is sans-supernatural an essential characteristic of a BBS whose users are mainly educated (by using this word I must say sorry to the one who invent this verb with his/her best innocent conscience.) adults?
a clear mind certainly gives negation to all the three questions.