比较难说，如是说实战走法那就像电脑了。这棋心理上还是有问题所以比较难接受如果是拆解，就是讲究实战的下法（这么下出比较正确的棋）。但是人的思维是靠判断能力。跟电脑不一样。电脑是纯靠计算。 从某种角度来开这盘棋，人的思维还是不太愿意。如黑棋后面下得滴水不漏这盘失败的根源很可能就是这步了。

game2 廖铭濠-先负-吕瑞展 (25mingame) (more...)

不是如果时间紧张，马三进四比较浮，可以排除不走。但如果有时间仔细分析，红方并非完全放开中路，所以仍有变化，可以考虑计算。人凭经验加快计算，但经验同时也可以局限了自己计算的空间。有时候尝试一些看起来奇怪的着法还是好的，不能一概贴上电脑走法的标签。

"努力" does not equate to playing more games.....I feel that "sparring" is actually an "examination" of "what you know" and your ability to apply that knowledge. It also includes a player's physical condition as well as mental strength and stability. Hence, trainings should be more focused instead of purely playing with different opponents everyday. Example, if you want to train opening, you do research on a particular topic and conclude whatever you had learnt. If you want to train midgame, you can look at those midgames of china masters and think of what you are going to move if you are the masters. For end games, you can train by learning those "ding shi".

Come, challenge you. You are NasiLemak rite?

哈哈哈，称霸新加坡棋坛数十年？敢问棋一生何以断定？

不是如果时间紧张，马三进四比较浮，可以排除不走。但如果有时间仔细分析，红方并非完全放开中路，所以仍有变化，可以考虑计算。人凭经验加快计算，但经验同时也可以局限了自己计算的空间。有时候尝试一些看起来奇怪的着法还是好的，不能一概贴上电脑走法的标签。

Tonight 0000 I am free, what wants to challenge me ??

"努力" does not equate to playing more games.....I feel that "sparring" is actually an "examination" of "what you know" and your ability to apply that knowledge. It also includes a player's physical condition as well as mental strength and stability. Hence, trainings should be more focused instead of purely playing with different opponents everyday. Example, if you want to train opening, you do research on a particular topic and conclude whatever you had learnt. If you want to train midgame, you can look at those midgames of china masters and think of what you are going to move if you are the masters. For end games, you can train by learning those "ding shi".

Come, challenge you. You are NasiLemak rite?

下彩棋 -- personal experiences ...... previously -- -- to play with some with 10-board system, at the end, paid for a good dinner including some viewers, i.e. no money to the winner(s). Now in the planning stage (nothing to do with Bishan Xiangqi Club) -- 1 -- to have say 8 players (so far I heard 3 bishan and 3 non-bishan) using round robin system. (total of 28 boards) 2 -- each one to pay $70 as registration fee. (total of $560) 3 -- at the end of the 28 games, each win will have $10 back, each draw will have say $3 back 4 -- the pool will have $280 or more for a good dinner after the end of 28 games 5 -- plan to start from mid Sep 2009 when the registration is closed, dinner before CNY as a gathering.

“称霸”，我指的是“棋力”，不是年年夺冠！ 由于棋赛制度与人为的可能因素，一名棋力强的棋手，不可能年年夺冠。我个人认为，过去曾经称霸我国棋坛数十年的前辈棋手有：沈云清、郑祥福、李庆先与林耀森。

谢谢你的夸奖但是我自己并不认为我的天赋高。。我并不认为自己有很大的天赋高。我今天的成绩是因为以前下棋非常认真也很用功。跟很多冠军比起来天赋可能要差一些。

不是如果时间紧张，马三进四比较浮，可以排除不走。但如果有时间仔细分析，红方并非完全放开中路，所以仍有变化，可以考虑计算。人凭经验加快计算，但经验同时也可以局限了自己计算的空间。有时候尝试一些看起来奇怪的着法还是好的，不能一概贴上电脑走法的标签。

小北斗的见解正确，上仕较马三进四稳正！ 但我认为红方红方第19着补仕才是致负的根源，补士让黑方炮打中兵又双车占据要道，输棋是迟早的事。局面劣势要采取混战或简化的战略，第19着我会走兵五进一逼兑或马三进五兑炮再炮二进六打车混战！

吕瑞展 2-0 ZJSgame1 ZJS 先负 吕瑞展 game2 吕瑞展 先胜 ZJS (more...)

吕瑞展 2-0 ZJSgame1 ZJS 先负 吕瑞展 game2 吕瑞展 先胜 ZJS (more...)

他终于恢复一半平时的状态，我不是他的对手，只是同他切磋! :-)

他终于恢复一半平时的状态，我不是他的对手，只是同他切磋! :-)