看examiner的习性比较重要

自然一点, 就当是在介绍自己的孩子当年我present的时候就是这种感觉, 做了一年, 象自己生的一样, 多有感情~~

都是走个过场。。。就是看你用心做了没有。。。没人听你滔滔不绝的胡扯。 我那回准备了30分钟的presentation，老师要求我在3分钟之内说完。。。-_-"。 把你的核心内容好好准备一下吧，能吹就多吹点。。。吹不了就照着slide说吧。 祝你好运。

IS的evaluators对吗...的确要看个人这里就不好解释了,要看你的evaluators是哪两位了:)

放松，就当下面坐俩傻子

啊，我想起来了，他们在最后一般都会问你比较standard问题，例如1。 你觉得你学的哪些课对这个project有用 2。你这个东西可不可以commercialise, if so, what's the advantage of your product compared with those that already exist in the market 3. why you use certain things instead of others (like why you use TCP intead of UDP or simply IP)? sometimes in terms of material 4. some specific features or goals are set by your supervisor, but did you ever think of trying the other way around, like using certain material, achieve certain percentage of efficiency, using this tool instead of that one pointed by your supervisor 5. what do you learn from this project? you main achievement? 6. what's your supervisor's role? (don't say, without your supervisor you can't even finish this project although it may be true....as it sounds negative, haha) etc.