从字面上看MIP不等于MORTGAGE INSUARANCE
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 本帖共有 1 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:bigmice (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:1034) 发表:2017-03-18 19:35:27  楼主  关注此帖
找到了ABS 对MIP 的解释:https://abs.org.sg/docs/library/faq_fire_insurance_20140410.pdf 第3题。我贴在下面,有兴趣的话可以看看。 虽然我还是觉得对屋主不公平,但银行如果非要买貌似屋主也没有办法。 非常感谢 大叔 和 x4 的踊跃讨论! 3. What is a Mortgagee Interest Policy (MIP)? Why do I have to take up a MIP when there is a MCST policy? If the condominium unit is mortgaged, the bank may require the borrower to take up a MIP, which generally protects the outstanding loan amount and allows the bank to claim up to the loss amount, the sum insured or the building reinstatement value (whichever is the lower) following the damage. However, not all banks require their customers to take up a MIP. As part of the terms and conditions for taking up the housing loan to purchase the property, you have agreed that the financial interest of the lending bank would be protected by insurance should any damage and loss occur to the mortgaged property. As provided under the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act, the insu (more...)
从字面上看MIP不等于MORTGAGE INSUARANCE
前者是转移债主,保护银行。 后者是保护投保人。大多数选择的是后者。
很少听到MIP,可能孤陋寡闻了,哈哈。
Life is Great
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 1 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码