登录 | 首页 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 切换到:传统版 / sForum | 树形列表
【房】国大研究显示HDB组屋比99年地契私宅更保值
<<始页  [1]  2  下页>  末页>> 

【房】国大研究显示HDB组屋比99年地契私宅更保值Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS study They enjoy constant upgrading from the government’s Home Improvement Programme.
Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats above 30 years are able to withstand against ageing effects and depreciate less compared to private non-landed housing, according to a study by the National University of Singapore (NUS).
The study, which looked at the depreciation rates of resale houses from 1997 to 2017 using historical resale transaction prices of HDB and condo properties found that the differences amongst the properties appeared only after ten years.
Control measures were also accounted for non-age related factors such as housing size, type, number of housing units in the neighbourhood and distances to the nearest MRT station and the Central Business District (CBD).
Researchers found that within the first ten years, the depreciation rates between the properties were similar. HDB flats depreciated 1% faster than leasehold and freehold non-landed residential properties and were related to building age. After ten years, private freehold residential properties were found to have generally depreciated at a slower rate relative to private leasehold residential housing and HDB flats.
Once housing reached 21 years and above, the depreciation rate for HDB flats stood at approximately 3%, whilst freehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 10%. Leasehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 30% once they reached the same age.
“The increasing ageing effects of private properties above 30 years old is probably due to lack of maintenance of the building and its surroundings,” NUS associate professor and the study’s co-author Sing Tien Foo said in a statement. “HDB flats enjoy the benefits of upgrading efforts such as the Singapore government’s Home Improvement Programme that help reduce the ageing effects more effectively than private properties.”
He added that the ageing problem is more serious for private leasehold property owners who face both ageing and lease decaying effects, given that ageing can speed up the economic obsoleteness of older buildings.
Sumit Agarwal, Low Tuck Kwong distinguished professor in finance from the NUS Business School, noted that redevelopment schemes and subsidy grants of up to $50,000 for first-time buyers of resale flats further slow the price depreciation of older HDB flats. 

https://sbr.com.sg/residential-property/news/old-hdb-flats-weather-depreciation-better-condos-nus-study
该帖荣获当日十大第3,奖励楼主15分以及22华新币,时间:2019-02-13 22:00:01。
[花生豆 (2-13 15:17, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]1楼

Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS studyThey enjoy constant upgrading from the government's Home Improvement Programme.

Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats above 30 years are able to withstand against ageing effects and depreciate less compared to private non-landed housing, according to a study by the National University of Singapore (NUS).

The study, which looked at the depreciation rates of resale houses from 1997 to 2017 using historical resale transaction prices of HDB and condo properties found that the differences amongst the properties appeared only after ten years.

Control measures were also accounted for non-age related factors such as housing size, type, number of housing units in the neighbourhood and distances to the nearest MRT station and the Central Business District (CBD).

Researchers found that within the first ten years, the depreciation rates between the properties were similar. HDB flats depreciated 1% faster than leasehold and freehold non-landed residential properties and were related to building age. After ten years, private freehold residential properties were found to have generally depreciated at a slower rate relative to private leasehold residential housing and HDB flats.

Once housing reached 21 years and above, the depreciation rate for HDB flats stood at approximately 3%, whilst freehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 10%. Leasehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 30% once they reached the same age.

“The increasing ageing effects of private properties above 30 years old is probably due to lack of maintenance of the building and its surroundings,” NUS associate professor and the study’s co-author Sing Tien Foo said in a statement. “HDB flats enjoy the benefits of upgrading efforts such as the Singapore government’s Home Improvement Programme that help reduce the ageing effects more effectively than private properties.”

He added that the ageing problem is more serious for private leasehold property owners who face both ageing and lease decaying effects, given that ageing can speed up the economic obsoleteness of older buildings.

Sumit Agarwal, Low Tuck Kwong distinguished professor in finance from the NUS Business School, noted that redevelopment schemes and subsidy grants of up to $50,000 for first-time buyers of resale flats further slow the price depreciation of older HDB flats.
[花生豆 (2-13 15:18, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]2楼

人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。[qqdriver (2-13 15:35, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]3楼

楼主真好人太喜欢这个研究了



哈哈哈哈
 [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [mirage (2-13 15:41, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]4楼

(引用 qqdriver:人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。)享受得起当然享受享受不起还不能看看文章自嗨一下。。。  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [mirage (2-13 15:42, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]5楼

(引用 qqdriver:人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。)为赋新诗强说愁怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的  [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [riskhunter (2-13 16:02, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]6楼

(引用 riskhunter:为赋新诗强说愁怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的)哈哈好犀利  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [mwddd (2-13 16:25, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]7楼

(引用 riskhunter:为赋新诗强说愁怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的)扫兴啊  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [mirage (2-13 16:26, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]8楼

(引用 花生豆:Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS studyThey enjoy constant upgrading from the government's Home Improve...)请问NUS教授住公寓还是HDB呢?请先自清一下。[熊维妮 (2-13 16:31, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]9楼

(引用 熊维妮:请问NUS教授住公寓还是HDB呢?请先自清一下。)注意1997 to 2017 年数据不愧是教授,试试看1998-2018,保证结果相反。  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [shaokunlun (2-13 16:40, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]10楼

More details from channelnewsasiahttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-housing-nus-study-11237604
The study was co-authored by a team at NUS, consisting of Prof Sing, Prof Agarwal, NUS Business School professor Low Tuck Kwong and PhD student Zhang Xiaoyu.
这图表太吓人了. 

[花生豆 (2-13 16:49, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]11楼

这就是你们和NUS教授的差距作为教授,需要考虑到社会影响,要营造和谐社会。新加坡80%的人都住hdb,如果教授研究出来发现私宅更加保值增值,那就会刺激到大多数人的神经,影响社会稳定和谐。教授研究的结果,要根据社会需要。[qqdriver (2-13 16:58, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]12楼

(引用 花生豆:More details from channelnewsasiahttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-h ...)看到这个图,知道叫兽这个词怎么来了它只比较了不同时期的价格,去掉了组屋和公寓的升值部分。  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [shaokunlun (2-13 17:12, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]13楼

(引用 shaokunlun:看到这个图,知道叫兽这个词怎么来了它只比较了不同时期的价格,去掉了组屋和公寓的升值部分。)狮王碰线图和叫兽图孰真孰假

[shaokunlun (2-13 17:20, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]14楼

(引用 花生豆:More details from channelnewsasiahttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-h ...)豆哥你是来逗大家玩的吧不会真相信吧。。。  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [shaokunlun (2-13 17:25, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]15楼

shafa撕逼大战一触即发  [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [我是老万 (2-13 17:35, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]16楼

(引用 shaokunlun:狮王碰线图和叫兽图孰真孰假 ...)有趣的是国家发展部长貌似非常认可这个碰线理论 

 
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/lawrence-wong-property-price-indexes-114624821.html
[花生豆 (2-13 17:52, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]17楼

帮顶坐等大神来科普  [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [小花兄 (2-13 18:08, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]18楼

国大研究在坡上的意义就等同于CCTV在中国的报道吧  [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [yaoyao8 (2-14 8:57, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]19楼

主要是前一段时间,由房屋经纪主导了一波组屋99年后归零的舆论,试图引导大众抛弃组屋,多买公寓。
所以教授们用数据研究来说明,要买也要买free hold的,99年公寓还不如组屋呢
[一棵大树 (2-14 9:11, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]20楼


<<始页  [1]  2  下页>  末页>> 
登录 | 首页 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | [刷新本页] | 切换到:传统版 / sForum