thanks a lot. how about the warranty of IBM harddisk? I am checking their prices
所在版块:
技术の宅
发贴时间:2004-04-22 21:07
用户信息
昵称:
maspero
经验: 351
等级: 2 初出茅庐
资产:
451
华新币
发贴: 151
在线: 99.6 小时
复制本帖HTML代码
我要回复↙
相关跟贴↙
平板模式
手机浏览
下一跟贴
只看此人
本帖链接
字体:
小
中
大
高亮
:
今天贴
X
昨天贴
X
前天贴
X
btw, I used to use 75GXP which is said to be broken easily while works fine in my machine, hehe. Still trust IBM.
.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!
Put your OWN COOL signature here!
相关帖子
我要回复↙
↗回到正文
想买个120G的硬盘,有没有推荐的?稳定性第一
-
maspero
2004-04-22 10:08
(
66 bytes , 837reads
)
Seagate Savvio
-
香陵居士
2004-04-22 22:24
(
26 bytes , 286reads
)
have you used it before?
-
逃课专家
2004-04-23 11:10
(
331 bytes , 360reads
)
Of course I never used, but your argue is not so strong
-
香陵居士
2004-04-24 04:38
(
1320 bytes , 345reads
)
i am just telling the truth
-
逃课专家
2004-04-24 12:19
(
1379 bytes , 737reads
)
Ok, then I'm wrong, I believe you,
-
香陵居士
2004-04-27 01:59
(
146 bytes , 330reads
)
"sound like 电锯" .. haha very accurate, exactly what i want to say
-
Rick
2004-04-23 14:05
(
0 bytes , 275reads
)
多谢,你们都是指的这两个品牌的最新型号么?
-
maspero
2004-04-22 20:49
(
56 bytes , 361reads
)
印象中还没有见过WD硬盘崩溃的实例
-
逃课专家
2004-04-22 21:58
(
304 bytes , 326reads
)
支持WD,最稳定的,网络支持率最高的
-
On
2004-04-23 14:47
(
0 bytes , 315reads
)
For IBM, i don't hear many complain for 100GXP and newer models.
-
Rick
2004-04-22 20:59
(
167 bytes , 417reads
)
correction: 120GXP not 100GXP
-
Rick
2004-04-22 23:45
(
0 bytes , 234reads
)
7K250的80G(2mb)真便宜,报价才107,不知道现在买2mb的是不是太落伍
-
maspero
2004-04-22 22:24
(
0 bytes , 294reads
)
好像只有75GXP,60GXP,120GXP,180GXP和7K250
-
逃课专家
2004-04-22 21:51
(
18 bytes , 259reads
)
这次丢脸了,怪不得我写100GXP的时候,自己都觉得有点怪。。
-
Rick
2004-04-22 23:44
(
40 bytes , 254reads
)
thanks a lot. how about the warranty of IBM harddisk? I am checking their prices
-
maspero
2004-04-22 21:07
(
113 bytes , 346reads
)
WD
-
逃课专家
2004-04-22 11:58
(
0 bytes , 278reads
)
IBM/Hitachi
-
SmellsLikeTeenSpirit
2004-04-22 10:31
(
0 bytes , 253reads
)
support.
-
Rick
2004-04-22 13:44
(
0 bytes , 287reads
)
western digital
-
On
2004-04-22 10:27
(
0 bytes , 257reads
)