NUS MFE是part-time的,NTU是(designed for)full-time的,都比CFA
所在版块：狮城财经 发贴时间：2005-06-12 18:43

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
重quantitative analysis得多

仅仅一个CFA还不足以get yourself in any large bank as a front-office (support) personnel

同样仅仅一个MFE(either NUS or NTU)也不足以get yourself considered for asset/portfolio　management iBank related roles

当然都是基于之前没有相关经验的假设
.
欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

　相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
CFA, NUS Finacial Engineering, NTU Financial Engineering, 那个比较好？ － sales 　2005-06-08 10:15 (26 bytes , 1262reads )
I hear NTU's is better than NUS's － 知非 　2005-06-08 21:11 (0 bytes , 299reads )
actually, much better － 连爷爷您回来了 　2005-06-10 16:11 (0 bytes , 348reads )
why much better? Teachers? Students? curriculum or... － 东风41 　2005-06-11 14:38 (224 bytes , 389reads )
Now only heard advise on NUS v.s. NTU, any opnion on Financia Engin v.s. CFA ? － sales 　2005-06-12 17:36 (0 bytes , 369reads )
NUS MFE是part-time的,NTU是(designed for)full-time的,都比CFA － JXTA 　2005-06-12 18:43 (271 bytes , 1224reads )
how abt getting both － box 　2005-06-12 21:33 (33 bytes , 395reads )