来来来,看看昨天政府贴出的辟谣
所在版块:心情闲聊 发贴时间:2021-06-08 12:47

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
EXPERT COMMITTEE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION CONTINUES TO ENDORSE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MRNA COVID-19 VACCINES
7TH JUN 2021
The Expert Committee on COVID-19 Vaccination (EC19V) recommended that the messenger RNA-based (“mRNA”) COVID-19 vaccines – Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines - be used in Singapore following the authorisation of both vaccines by the Health Science Authority (HSA) under the Pandemic Special Access Route (PSAR). We have noted social media messages asserting that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective against Variants of Concern (VOCs) and that inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccines would provide superior protection. Our assessment, based on a continual review of data and evidence, remains that the PSAR-authorised mRNA vaccines are safe and highly effective, and continue to show protection against the VOCs. The inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccines have variable protection and there is currently no evidence to suggest that inactivated virus vaccines demonstrate higher vaccine efficacy against VOCs than the mRNA vaccines.

PSAR-Authorised mRNA Vaccines Are Safe and Effective Against COVID-19

2 The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines have been consistently shown to be highly efficacious, at around 90%, especially in protecting against severe COVID-19 disease and hospitalisation. This was first demonstrated in the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials, and further supported with the data from actual roll-outs in the real-world, including in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and Israel. This includes protection against key VOCs such as the alpha and beta variants, which were the predominant strains circulating in these countries.

3 Despite concerns over the delta variant, emerging data shows that the mRNA vaccines continue to be effective. A study in the UK demonstrated that two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine confer about 88% protection against symptomatic COVID-19 even with the delta variant. While further studies are required before a definitive conclusion can be made, the available data globally indicates that substantial protection is preserved.

4 Protection conferred by any vaccine is not 100%, and with the emergence and spread of new variants due to mutations, vaccine-breakthrough infections can occur. The detection of asymptomatic to mild infections locally with the delta variant does not indicate a lack of protection. The finding that the infections have been asymptomatic to mild in symptoms is in keeping with the global evidence that the mRNA vaccines have a high level of protection against symptomatic and severe disease.

5 The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines have been approved by multiple reputable international regulatory bodies. The manufacturers have publicly released their detailed study protocols and openly published their findings to be scrutinised by the scientific community after peer review. The detailed assessments of their vaccines by regulatory bodies such as the US Food and Drug Administration and the UK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency have also been publicly published.

6 In sum, the PSAR-authorised mRNA vaccines have reliable scientific evidence that they are safe and effective, and the EC19V continues to strongly recommend that medically eligible persons should be vaccinated with them.

COVID-19 Inactivated Virus Vaccines

7 The Sinovac vaccine has yet to meet the requirements for a PSAR authorisation by HSA as additional safety and quality data required to meet the standards of the PSAR evaluation are still pending. The Sinovac vaccine has also shown variable protection across multiple studies carried out internationally. The most complete analysis of the vaccine showed a vaccine efficacy of 51% on per-protocol analysis. The protection of Sinovac against newer variants such as the delta variant and under real-world conditions remains unknown.

8 Sinovac has been qualified by WHO under its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) Procedure for use only in persons aged 18 years and above. WHO does not recommend it for use in persons below age 18 years. As such, it is currently not an option for children and adolescents globally nor in Singapore under the Special Access Route (SAR).

9 It is critical that medical professionals do not spread unsubstantiated and unscientific information. The public has a right to expect medical professionals to give advice based on fact and not on unproven assertions. The public should rely on reputable sources of scientific and medical information, and verify opinions shared by others against these. The PSAR-authorised mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, and the EC19V recommends that medically eligible persons in Singapore should be vaccinated with them.


EXPERT COMMITTEE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION
7 JUNE 2021


Sinovac靠啥逆袭,就靠那51%的有效率?政府能批准才怪。老铁赶快自己掏钱去打啦,别整天在这里唧唧歪歪了,等会其他真老铁把那20万疫苗用光了
.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
科兴能逆袭吗? SinghousePro   (3542 bytes , 4335reads )
对了,还有某些喷子可能是 andy99   (20 bytes , 16reads )
上过学吗 牛的三猫   (28 bytes , 19reads )
MRNA 小土   (60 bytes , 18reads )
对,科兴是唯一的救世主 牛的三猫   (18 bytes , 23reads )
我觉得从数据走 小土   (55 bytes , 13reads )
我也不知道为什么 牛的三猫   (66 bytes , 21reads )
因为某些喷子,要么就是坡县政府说啥就是啥,要么就是美国说啥就是啥 andy99   (38 bytes , 14reads )
还有一种你忘了 牛的三猫   (28 bytes , 15reads )
你这结论有啥根据? edb   (0 bytes , 18reads )
在新加坡逆袭不能说明什么 typhoonzj   (144 bytes , 12reads )
关键是口罩问题让这些专家信用全失, lgland   (39 bytes , 14reads )
英国已经预警了,病毒可能会出现 Blzrd   (50 bytes , 14reads )
欧美洋人要自由啊,没疫苗跟坐牢差不多了 andy99   (28 bytes , 18reads )
我说的某些喷子上线了,比我预测的早太多了 andy99   (58 bytes , 12reads )
疫苗是物理隔离防疫的辅助 lgland   (213 bytes , 12reads )
来来来,看看昨天政府贴出的辟谣 edb   (5019 bytes , 16reads )
路透社报道科兴日产疫苗逾600万剂, Blzrd   (34 bytes , 19reads )
第一第二第三世界国家, Blzrd   (78 bytes , 12reads )
老毛发明与人斗,老邓摸石头,老江与时进,老胡不折腾,大大撸袖子 Flag888   (0 bytes , 20reads )
哈哈,这个顺口溜 Blzrd   (10 bytes , 10reads )
个人观点 小弟我   (108 bytes , 14reads )
中肯, Blzrd   (77 bytes , 12reads )
这个我也是非常不理解 油菜花开了   (92 bytes , 12reads )
只是希望有关专家 抓紧研究 gobackC   (79 bytes , 14reads )
所以东南亚其他都不行,不够格,新加坡够格达到第一世界发达国家标准 andy99   (94 bytes , 14reads )
某些"贬死中国"的喷子可能在路上了 andy99   (24 bytes , 11reads )
中国五一全民全国旅游 typhoonzj   (42 bytes , 14reads )
就是, Blzrd   (12 bytes , 9reads )
中国的抗疫可是教科书级别, Blzrd   (72 bytes , 14reads )
因为某些喷子会说新加坡是第一世界国家 andy99   (88 bytes , 13reads )
所谓的第一世界国家 Blzrd   (14 bytes , 13reads )
还是用"新加坡是第一世界国家"这个解释最能说明实际问题吧 andy99   (88 bytes , 11reads )
谁是老大谁就是标准 Blzrd   (46 bytes , 12reads )
定义为中西医结合比较好 dsx1   (196 bytes , 14reads )
这玩意要不是因为中国缺少足够病例做三期实验 typhoonzj   (212 bytes , 11reads )
巴西地处美国的后花园范围 typhoonzj   (223 bytes , 8reads )
不能 牛的三猫   (54 bytes , 20reads )
具体指什么呢? stefinia   (0 bytes , 17reads )
参见泰国, Blzrd   (45 bytes , 9reads )
也许某些情况下的数据,是证明疫苗对日耳曼人有效 andy99   (55 bytes , 16reads )
上科兴不如上国药 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 12reads )
有一定道理,减少了某些争议,让某些其他因素是否重要付出水面 andy99   (0 bytes , 13reads )
数据会说话 haomi2015   (24 bytes , 8reads )
看印度政府是不是跟湾湾一样,宁可多死一些人也不愿意用中国的疫苗了 andy99   (0 bytes , 11reads )
建议科兴只需搞定人口仅次于中国的印度, Blzrd   (18 bytes , 18reads )
以上同样适用于中国国药的疫苗。 andy99   (28 bytes , 8reads )
新加坡是第一世界国家嘛 andy99   (200 bytes , 14reads )
我说 德华九九 gobackC   (319 bytes , 15reads )
为了让某些人觉得自己生活的土地比较"高贵"嘛 andy99   (150 bytes , 14reads )
了解你的意思,你也是故意这么说的 gobackC   (98 bytes , 16reads )
确切的说 dsx1   (36 bytes , 17reads )
没错 gobackC   (39 bytes , 14reads )
不懂科兴为啥需要逆袭,据记忆 Blzrd   (94 bytes , 10reads )
这是媒体用来抓眼球的话。 love962397   (70 bytes , 16reads )
如果科兴打败了pfizer mordena, Blzrd   (14 bytes , 12reads )
务实的政府会选择最有效的疫苗。 love962397   (10 bytes , 13reads )
昨晚的straitstimes有报导, Blzrd   (42 bytes , 11reads )